Search for: "Steven B. John"
Results 701 - 720
of 996
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jul 2010, 12:53 pm
Nicholson observes, [B]ooks of facts always display localized preferences, cultural values, sometimes straightforward prejudices. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 4:55 pm
And some justices in the past have been full of surprises, including Justice John Paul Stevens, the justice she will replace. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 12:00 am
IN RE JULIA B. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:20 pm
” he asked Theodore B. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 6:00 am
" Acting New York State Police Superintendent John P. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 7:55 pm
John Deere Co. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 2:37 pm
As Timothy B. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 11:02 am
Breyer, joined by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg in another concurring opinion, simply said that it was unnecessary to reach the issue of judicial takings.Justice John Paul Stevens did not appear at oral argument and didn’t vote, after a Cato Institute scholar circulated documents indicating Stevens owned a waterfront condominium in Florida in a beach renourishment area. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 9:31 am
Section 100(b) provides that “[t]he term ‘process’ means process, art or method, and includes a new use of a known process, machine, manufacture, composition of matter, or material. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 8:25 am
”**In passing, of a different case on June 28 wherein Kennedy sided with the liberal wing (not the conservative wing), note the decision in UCal Hastings vs. the Christian Legal Society wherein Justice Ginsburg was joined by justices John Paul Stevens, Anthony Kennedy, Stephen Breyer and Sonia Sotomayor. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 12:24 pm
While Justice Stevens’s concurrence suggests that it leaves them untouched, this conclusion seems questionable. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 7:54 am
(John Elwood) The “Honest Services” fraud cases are getting all the attention. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 2:43 pm
Justice John Paul Stevens, joined by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, protested in a separate opinion that the new decision was part of “the Court’s continuing campaign” to “render toothless” the right of private investors to sue to enforce Section 10-b. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 3:17 pm
” (Canon 5(B) at p. 16) On its face, however, the code does not apply to Supreme Court justices (see p.2). [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 1:10 am
Fifty months ago "Steven" and I had an ongoing debate about a post I wrote about the John Ritter case. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 7:35 pm
Justice John Paul Stevens' legacy and the implications of replacing him on the Supreme Court is the focus of this experts’ roundtable hosted by the National Constitution Center and the University of Pennsylvania Law School. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 7:34 pm
I. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 1:38 am
Resigned after admitting to an extramarital affair with a staffer. (2010) [227] New York Congressman Eric Massa,(D) Resigned to avoid an ethics investigation into his alleged behavior of groping and tickling a young male staffer. (2010) [5] Texas Federal District Judge Samuel B. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 5:03 pm
John T. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 6:46 am
Briefly: At ACSblog, Professor Amanda Leiter has a post on the legacy of retiring Justice John Paul Stevens, in which she comments on both her personal experiences while clerking for Stevens during the 2003 Term and his environmental jurisprudence. [read post]
