Search for: "The Active v. United States" Results 701 - 720 of 18,207
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Sep 2023, 6:47 pm
  Even the Americans recognize that, as the title of a recent text posted to the United States Institute for Peace Website noted: "The New Nonaligned Movement Is Having a Moment" (May 2023). [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 1:36 pm by Sophia Cope
But the court rejected the plaintiffs’ argument that the Registration Requirement prevents them from doing so because of the rule’s chilling effect on the social media activity of would-be visitors to the United States. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 7:55 am by Ben Sperry
Below, I elaborate first on how transaction costs doom the aims of age-verification and verifiable parental-consent laws, and then consider the state of First Amendment precedent for anonymous speech as it relates to age-verification laws. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
United State, a huge tax case the Court will hear this term. [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 1:17 pm by Tobin Admin
An earlier case, the Supreme Court concluded that a ports authority was entitled to sovereign immunity because it was a State administrative unit responsible for the State’s docks. [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 9:44 am by Gene Takagi
Alexis de Tocqueville, Of the Use Which Americans Make of Public Associations and Civic Life, Section 2, Chapter V in Democracy in America, Volume II (1840). [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 5:17 am by Eugene Volokh
I'm a mother of four children and I live in the United States without any family for the last seventeen years. [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 10:53 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 According to Allen, Toyota USA “sells Toyota Parts in the United States at prices substantially higher than those charged by Toyota in other places. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 9:02 am by Norman L. Eisen
Shawn Still (1:23-cv-03792) (civil removal proceedings) Mar-a-Lago (MAL): United States v. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 7:13 am by Eugene Volokh
United States (1908) and Indian trust doctrine under United States v. [read post]