Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Brown"
Results 701 - 720
of 3,745
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2021, 12:08 pm
In Hudson v. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 9:45 am
Here's a very rough draft (not yet cite-checked and proofread), which you can also read in PDF; I'd love to hear people's view on it. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 3:49 am
In United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 12:56 pm
Supreme Court justice Thurgood Marshall later acknowledged [Pauli Murray’s first book, States’ Laws on Race and Color] as his ‘bible’ in the historic Brown v. [read post]
18 Jun 2021, 9:02 am
Tax law professor Dorothy Brown commented: “Here’s another example of NYT tax reporting ignoring race. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 6:30 am
The most celebrated argument for why Brown v. [read post]
16 Jun 2021, 2:57 pm
Kasrawi and me, quite frankly, is that he's more brown than I am -- which I suspect might play some role in why Officer Pardue had a "hunch" that Mr. [read post]
16 Jun 2021, 6:30 am
” Professor Avins and the Commission were convinced that Brown v. [read post]
16 Jun 2021, 3:30 am
Supreme Court ruling in Bostock v. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 9:08 pm
The Justice Department cited the Supreme Court’s reasoning in FDA v. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 5:59 pm
Ferguson, which held that segregation did not imply Black people's inferiority, and instead only mentioned its ideas in discussing Brown v. [read post]
2 Jun 2021, 2:57 pm
That whole "looking for kiddie porn" thing is -- to put it mildly -- super fraught with danger, wholly apart from its many other unsavory aspects.Lest anyone believe that these things aren't super easy to discover, Justice Brown's opinion goes into detail about the automated system that apparently thousands of police officers are using every single day to find people sharing kiddie porn:"In August 2014, Vacaville police detective Jeffrey… [read post]
23 May 2021, 4:08 pm
The statement highlights the strong overlap between promoting and protecting competition in digital markets and safeguarding people’s data. [read post]
23 May 2021, 4:01 am
Desautel, 2019 BCCA 151, 2021 SCC 17 (38734) Whether a group is an Aboriginal people of Canada is a threshold question, in the sense that if a group is not an Aboriginal people of Canada, there is no need to proceed to the Van der Peet test. [read post]
18 May 2021, 11:13 am
That all changed in 1961 with the Supreme Court’s decision in Monroe v. [read post]
15 May 2021, 9:30 am
(But see Brown v. 20th Century Fox) If you are hearing about reuse negotiations for the first time, don’t feel bad, it’s often overlooked even by the smart people. [read post]
14 May 2021, 7:37 pm
” Brown v. [read post]
14 May 2021, 12:11 pm
As the Supreme Court recognized in Brown v. [read post]
14 May 2021, 9:44 am
In State v. [read post]
14 May 2021, 6:30 am
Hall v. [read post]
