Search for: "The Standard Casing Company, Inc." Results 701 - 720 of 9,847
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Aug 2020, 9:05 pm by Jonan Pilet
A district court has ruled that victims of an E. coli outbreak on a Marine Corps base have sufficiently alleged that Sodexo Management Inc. exercised a conscious disregard of risk, which is the standard for punitive damages under California law The court in the Southern District of California was tasked to consider whether the proposed amendments have the facts that constitute a valid claim for punitive damage. [read post]
29 May 2013, 8:00 am by Steven G. Pearl
Greene Motors, Inc. (3/27/13) --- Cal.App.4th ---, is another case involving a standard arbitration agreement contained in many automobile sales contracts. [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 9:41 am by Steven Koprince
After evaluating competitive proposals, the Air Force announced that BryMak & Associates, Inc. was the apparent successful offeror. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 3:31 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
The issue was the dismissal of Royal Crown's opposition to proposed marks of Coca-Cola:Royal Crown Company, Inc. and Dr Pepper/Seven Up,Inc. [read post]
12 Apr 2021, 9:51 am by Erin Sales and Joyce Ackerbaum Cox
Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc., that websites are not “places of public accommodation” under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and rejected the “nexus” standard that has been adopted by several other federal circuits. [read post]
18 May 2014, 5:48 am by John H Curley
In the Coca-Cola case, the court overturned an arbitrator who had disregarded an lca entered into between the company and union in resolution of a grievance. [read post]
13 Jun 2015, 10:51 am by Jeffrey P. Gale, P.A.
Bldg., Inc., 445 So.2d 1015, 1018 (Fla.1984); see, also, Standard Jury Instruction – Civil Cases 401.3. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 5:08 pm by Jon Gelman
‘Prevailing Standard’ “The fact is that on the question of what is pertinent tothis case, we’re looking at... [read post]
8 Aug 2007, 12:12 pm
The case involved a securities fraud claim against a company that had to restate financial results in order to correct errors created by fraud at its Brazilian subsidiary.In an opinion by Chief Judge Easterbrook, the court said that Tellabs stands for two propositions relevant to this case. [read post]