Search for: "U. S. v. Fields" Results 701 - 720 of 834
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2010, 11:27 am by Brett Trout
” citing Gottschalk v. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 9:36 pm
It is correctly pronounced HOW STUN not U STONE like they do it in Texas. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 3:23 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Here, in Healy v Finz & Finz, P.C. 05/19/2010 Other Courts 2010 NYSlipOp 31391(U) we see a clear explanation of the rules of summary judgment, with appropriate deference to questions of fact. [read post]
12 Jun 2010, 6:54 am by Matt Bodie
  Buying a HUM-V seems kind of small in comparison. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 5:03 pm
Based on his administration of a series of field sobriety tests, the officer concluded Manriquez was under the influence of alcohol and at 12:17 a.m. arrested him for violation of Vehicle Code section 23152, subdivision (a). [read post]
27 May 2010, 3:40 pm by Bexis
  AERs “are neither exceptions to the hearsay rule nor data reasonably relied upon by experts in the field of making determinations of causality. [read post]
25 May 2010, 7:48 pm by Gilles Cuniberti
Conceptualizing Yahoo v L.C.R.A.: Private Law, Constitutional Review and International Conflict of Laws Ariel L. [read post]
24 May 2010, 11:11 am by Marvin Ammori
"Justice Stevens said in 1996:I believe the Government has an important interest in leveling theelectoral playing field by constraining the cost of federal campaigns. . . .It is quite wrong to assume that the net effect of limits on contributionsand expenditures—which tend to protect equal access to the politicalarena . . . [read post]
17 May 2010, 6:10 pm by Rumpole
S. 97, 102 (1976) (quoting Trop v. [read post]
12 May 2010, 2:41 pm by James R. Copland
Indeed, before her last year's service as Solicitor General, her most prominent litigation effort was probably having signed onto a wrongheaded amicus brief in Rumsfeld v. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 10:00 pm by Michael
Bettinger-López, the Human Rights Clinic, and the ACLU currently represent Gonzales in Jessica Gonzales v. [read post]