Search for: "US v. Cox"
Results 701 - 720
of 880
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Mar 2025, 4:58 pm
In Azar v. [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 9:01 pm
Cox Inc., just to name two examples. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 10:44 am
See, e.g., Ex parte Hennen, 38 U.S. (13 Pet.) 230, 259-60 (1839); accord PCAOB v. [read post]
3 May 2016, 2:11 pm
KTC: In terms of tech, assessing fair use—is that actually possible to use tech to comply w/court saying content owner must consider fair use? [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 12:25 pm
Re: United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 9:06 am
The cohort was followed for a median of 6.6 years, in which time there were 154 cases of ovarian cancer, available for analysis using Cox’s proportional hazards model. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 7:00 am
For example, in Matter of Cox, the AIP executed a POA appointing one of her daughters as agent (Matter of Cox, 47 Misc 3d 1211[A], 2015 NY Slip Op 50550[U] [Sup Ct, Kings County 2015]). [read post]
17 Feb 2025, 8:27 pm
Cox (10th Cir. 2018), which asserted that a suppressor "is a firearm accessory … not a weapon. [read post]
16 Jul 2017, 4:23 pm
Please let us know if there are any media and law events which you would like us to list. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 10:25 am
Wyden or Chris Cox. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 6:41 am
Co. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 9:30 pm
In Cox v. [read post]
3 Feb 2008, 10:42 pm
A letter from shareholders to the Honorable Christopher Cox, requesting a return to the pre-1990 interpretation of the Rule, stressed an important distinction: ". . . between using a shareholder resolution as a back-door device to contest a specific election and using a shareholder resolution in order to change the rules for election so as to further the long-term interests of shareholders. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 10:26 am
I encourage you to use the principles as a diagnostic for future Section 230 amendments. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 1:08 pm
On November 7, 2013, in Alexandria Surveys, LLC v. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 5:52 pm
Please contact us with additional items for this section and we will update the round up. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 2:00 am
Protecting computer programs under the Copyright Act: Dais Studios v Bullet Creative: (IP Down Under), Assessing copyright risk in new classroom technologies: (IP Down Under), Cadbury loses battle over exclusive use of colour purple for chocolate wrapping in its case against Darrell Lea: (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog), (IP Down Under), (IPKat), (IPwar’s), Employee or independent contractor? [read post]
Non-final orders, jurisdiction, and fresh pasta with tomatoes, rosemary and braised kale with garlic
4 Mar 2012, 1:47 pm
ROUTH, Appellant, v. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 5:32 am
Flagg v. [read post]
15 Feb 2021, 7:56 am
Following BMG v. [read post]
