Search for: "US v. Green" Results 701 - 720 of 6,043
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Aug 2022, 5:00 pm
  And a review of the subdivision map not only established a fixed location for the easement, but it also appears that one of the neighbors had an express grant to use the road, while the rest enjoyed an “implied easement” to get to their respective properties.Given those facts, the Washington County court was of the view that since Marlow’s requested change could not be implemented (without his neighbors’ consent), his lawsuit to compel the road's… [read post]
14 Aug 2022, 5:00 pm
And after reviewing the Subdivision Map for Roy Road, which unequivocally established a fixed location for the easement, it also appears that one of the neighbors received an express grant to use the road, while the rest enjoyed an “implied easement” to get to their respective properties.Given those facts, the Washington County court was of the view that since Marlow’s requested change could not be implemented (without his neighbors’ consent), his lawsuit to compel… [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 1:37 pm by Venkat Balasubramani
Smith-Green Mortuary Sciences College Student Disciplined for Threatening Facebook Posts–Tatro v. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:18 am by Schachtman
The relevant provision for sales of products to be used by a third party states that[4]: “One who supplies directly or through a third person a chattel for another to use is subject to liability to those whom the supplier should expect to use the chattel with the consent of the other or to be endangered by its probable use, for physical harm caused by the use of the chattel in the manner for which and by a person for whose use it is… [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 3:48 pm by highrank
  In a recent United States Supreme Court decision, Florida v. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 2:29 pm by Aimee Hess
The Texas Supreme Court recently granted a petition for review in the case of Denbury Green Pipeline-Texas LLC v. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 7:36 am
On Monday January 24th, 2011, a panel of Ontario Divisional Court Judges began hearing the case of Hanna v. [read post]