Search for: "United States of America v. O" Results 701 - 720 of 1,287
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Oct 2014, 12:25 pm
That person, if the United States is right, has committed a criminal offense, because she structured cash transactions “for the specific purpose of depriving the Government of the information that Section 5313(a) is designed to obtain. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
Now you may ask: how can a state overturn a United States Supreme Court decision on religious liberty? [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 11:39 am
Cl. 2, Amendments IX, X[1]·      German Basic Law, arts.20-25; 31[2]·      Constitution of South Africa, arts. 1, 2, 39, 146-150[3]·      Indiana Code 1-1-2-1[4]·      Hierarchy of Law in Georgia[5]__________Hierarchy of Law in the United StatesConstitution of the United StatesArticle, § 1All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a… [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 11:17 am
  The allegations, as discussed in United States ex rel. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 4:37 am by Kevin LaCroix
Although I try to include on this blog topics involving issues from outside the United States, because of my background and experience, U.S-related topics tend to predominate. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 4:26 am by Kevin LaCroix
NOMURA ASSET ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION et al, United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts, No. 06-10446-RGS. [read post]
31 Aug 2014, 12:49 pm
  In comparing the two readings what differences in approaches can one discern between that of equity as practiced outside the United States (in Australia) and in the United States.2. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 7:29 am
(collectively, “MadStad”) filed suit against the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”), its then director, David Kappos, in his official capacity, and the United States of America (collectively, “the Government”) in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 3:11 pm by Schachtman
In his graduate thesis, Historicizing the Forensification of History: A Study of Historians as Expert Witnesses in Tobacco Litigation in the United States of America (Univ. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 6:36 am
Media reports indicate that this Ordinance was drafted during the previous regime under the United Progressive Alliance. [read post]
29 May 2014, 8:09 am by Jason Rantanen
§ 141 (permitting “[a] party to an inter partes review … who is dissatisfied with the final written decision … [t]o] appeal the Board’s decision only to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit”). [read post]