Search for: "United States v. House of Representatives of United States"
Results 701 - 720
of 4,271
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Dec 2016, 1:45 am
Lord Pannick QC says it is no answer for the Government to say that the long title to the 1972 Act “says nothing about withdrawal“. 16:04: Lord Pannick QC refers to the case of Robinson v Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, which he submits supports a “flexible response” to constitutional developments. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 3:01 pm
United States 294 U.S. 330, Chief Justice Charles Evans Hughes rejected the narrow reading, stating ,“… its language indicates a broader connotation. [read post]
24 Jun 2024, 7:30 am
Liggett v. [read post]
3 Nov 2012, 8:44 am
During its 2011-2012 term, the United States Supreme Court issued momentous decisions regarding health care, immigration, and the death penalty. [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 9:00 am
Like many communities across the United States, a history of state-sanctioned housing discrimination has led Ferguson to be highly segregated by race. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
“Foreign person” means anyone that is not a United States citizen, national, or lawful permanent resident; any individual admitted to the United States as a refugee under 8 U.S.C. 1157 or granted asylum under 8 U.S.C. 1158; any entity organized solely under the laws of the United States or any jurisdiction within the United States (including foreign branches); or any person in the United States. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 12:16 pm
The House of Representatives on Jan. 15 transferred the articles of impeachment against Donald Trump to the Senate for trial. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 11:41 am
This is a particularly problematic situation that could cost someone entrance to the United States based on, for instance, their own or a friend’s political opinions—as happened to a Palestinian Harvard student when his social media account was reviewed when coming to the U.S. to start his semester. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 5:58 am
United States, 272 U.S. 52 (1926). [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 6:51 pm
It represents a shifting of coercive power from the external-the state, the police, and the institution to the internal-the individual and the private. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 6:00 am
” According to information reported by the New York Times and the Guardian, upon arriving in Syria, Muthana was placed in a house for single women and eventually paired with an Islamic State fighter for marriage. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 10:23 am
The first is Frothingham v. [read post]
14 Feb 2023, 10:55 am
Update: Gravel v. [read post]
24 Sep 2021, 7:27 am
V. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 2:00 pm
Because the art market is opaque, diligence is needed to discover an object's true chain of custody, transfer, and ownership.The latest court case demonstrating the need for due diligence is United States v. [read post]
28 Sep 2020, 9:01 pm
How do the bishops continue to wield sufficient political power to pack the United States Supreme Court while under the microscope for destroying so many children and families? [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 3:33 pm
Bose Corp. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 7:17 am
Supreme Court unanimously held in Trump v. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 11:38 am
Now we wait.Karen Partenan v. [read post]
19 May 2014, 6:09 am
United States, might simultaneously be at risk of quiet abrogation by the operation of predictive analytics. [read post]
