Search for: "V R v. State of Indiana" Results 701 - 720 of 1,757
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Oct 2014, 9:12 am
”Id. at 1141-42 (various citations omitted).Courts in other states following this general approach are:  Haygood v. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 7:21 pm by Joy Waltemath
When a wave of lawsuits challenged FedEx’s independent contractor model (with cases filed in 40 states), the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation consolidated the cases for multidistrict litigation proceedings in a federal district court in Indiana. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm by Schachtman
That goal ultimately came to have bipartisan support in the United States, largely as a result of Selikoff’s advocacy. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 12:20 pm by Cicely Wilson
This per curiam opinion also gave guidance to the state’s courts on options when confronted with abusive and vexatious litigation practices.Read more: Inspired by man who filed more than 120 lawsuits, Indiana Supreme Court sets pro se limitsDuke v. [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 12:24 pm
United States, 134 S.Ct. 881, 892 (2014)(quoting Commissioner v. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 8:40 am
The states that have such laws (or other laws that have this effect), as best I can tell, are California, Colorado, Connecticut, Hawaii, Indiana, Louisiana, Minnesota, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New York, North Dakota, Oregon, South Carolina, West Virginia, and Wyoming. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 7:39 am by Joy Waltemath
Finally, conflict preemption describes a situation where it is not possible for a party to comply with both the federal law and state law or where state law is an obstacle to fulfilling federal law, and the court did not perceive that Indiana wage statutes and common law contract principles required employer conduct inconsistent with INA requirements or that enforcing state law would “stand as an obstacle” to the INA. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 7:21 am
Plaintiff alleges that Defendants illegally intercepted and broadcast the Julio Cesar Chavez, Jr. v. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit struck down Indiana and Wisconsin laws denying recognition to same-sex marriages (SSMs) in those states, as violations of the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. [read post]