Search for: "Williams v. Cross" Results 701 - 720 of 1,627
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jun 2015, 9:31 am
William Goren hits us with Does Title II of the ADA Apply to Employment? [read post]
25 May 2015, 4:43 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  The judgment was entered against Household International; its former Chairman and CEO William Aldinger; its former CFO and COO David Schoenholz; and its former Vice-Chair of Consumer Lending Gary Gilmer. [read post]
19 May 2015, 12:01 pm by CJLF Staff
Joshua Cross that overturned defendant Cross' sentence. [read post]
13 May 2015, 8:27 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 So too with the presence of the ingredients on the ingredient list (citing the Ninth Circuit’s Williams v. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 12:29 pm by MOTP
Gallagher Risk Management, and Tracy Williams (collectively, the Insurance Brokers), asserting claims for negligence and breach of contract. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 12:29 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
Gallagher Risk Management, and Tracy Williams (collectively, the Insurance Brokers), asserting claims for negligence and breach of contract. [read post]
11 Apr 2015, 12:00 am
John Williams and I argued his appeal before this very court many, many years ago. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 7:08 pm by Brian Shiffrin
The court noted that there are unusual circumstances in which silence will be admissible (People v Rothschild, 35 NY2d 355 [1974] [defendant police officer had a duty to report to his supervisors if he was taking the bribe money as part of a "sting"]; People v Savage, 50 NY2d 673 [1980] [defendant told police he shot victim during an altercation, properly cross-examined on his failure to make claim that victim was trying to rob him, as he testified at trial]). [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 10:19 am by Brian Shiffrin
Previously, the Court held that where, as here, a prosecutor seeks testimony that the defendant’s version of events was not believable, the witness’s  “. . . testimony is equivalent to an opinion that the defendant is guilty, and the receipt of such testimony may not be condoned (People v Williams, 6 NY2d 18, 23 [1959]; People v Higgins, 5 NY2d 607, 627-628 [1959]; People v Gradon, 43 AD2d 842 [2d Dept 1984]). [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 11:06 am by Stephen Bilkis
After conferring with both sides, the Court decided to give the entire jury a specific charge on special knowledge or experience of a juror adapting a charge addressed to juror expertise, see People v. [read post]