Search for: "clayton" Results 701 - 720 of 4,959
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jun 2021, 4:09 pm by Bona Law PC
The states’ suit also claimed that the two acquisitions violated Clayton Act Section 7, the statutory prohibition of anticompetitive mergers. [read post]
29 Jun 2021, 3:30 am by Eric B. Meyer
Clayton County that an employer who fires an individual merely for being gay or transgender has discriminated based on sex in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 9:05 pm by Maya Satya Reddy
Clayton County, which held discrimination against transgender individuals violated federal civil rights law. [read post]
25 Jun 2021, 5:49 am
Problems with 10b5-1 plans have long been recognized—including by former SEC Chair Jay Clayton—so it will be interesting to see if any proposal that emerges will find support among the Commissioners on both sides of the SEC’s aisle. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 7:30 am by Porter Wright and Arslan Sheikh
Clayton County that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits employers from discriminating against an individual on the basis of sexual orientation or transgender status. [read post]
22 Jun 2021, 9:05 pm by Amal Bass
Clayton County, make it clear that discrimination “because of sex” necessarily includes sexual orientation and gender identity under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 6:14 am by John Jascob
One of the statements announced the reversal of a policy by former Chairman Jay Clayton; under the new policy, senior officers in the Division are authorized to approve the issuance of a Formal Order of Investigation. [read post]
Title IX’s new interpretation is based on the US Supreme Court’s verdict in Bostock v Clayton County in which the court held that discrimination based on gender identity or sexual orientation inherently involves discrimination based on sex. [read post]
Clayton County decision recognizing that LGBTQ+ employees are protected by Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, employers are increasingly finding themselves in the difficult position of having to weigh often diametrically opposed rights: religious freedom versus LGBTQ+ rights. [read post]
Clayton County decision recognizing that LGBTQ+ employees are protected by Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, employers are increasingly finding themselves in the difficult position of having to weigh often diametrically opposed rights: religious freedom versus LGBTQ+ rights. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 9:45 pm by Katelynn Catalano
Clayton County, which expanded the definition found in Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, which protects employees from sex-based discrimination. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 3:00 pm by Sean Wallace
Clayton has been part of the Harford Financial Group team since joining the firm as an intern in 2019. [read post]
16 Jun 2021, 9:00 am by admin
Clayton County that Title VII’s protections extend to the LGBT community. [read post]