Search for: "Does 1-35" Results 7181 - 7200 of 9,560
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 May 2011, 6:40 am by Robin E. Shea
Sign No. 1: The person who fired you is the same person who hired you not too long ago. [read post]
19 May 2011, 9:12 pm
The infringement provision of the Hatch-Waxman Act, 35 U.S.C. [read post]
19 May 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Article 5 bars extradition when the person sought has been convicted or acquitted in the Requested State for the same offense, but does not bar extradition if the authorities in the Requested State have decided not to prosecute or have decided to discontinue criminal proceedings against the person sought. [read post]
18 May 2011, 6:55 pm by FDABlog HPM
  The deadline for filing a claim is 35 days after receipt of personal notice from the seizing agency. [read post]
17 May 2011, 4:34 pm by Eric Schweibenz
  Specifically, the Commission determined to review:  (1) the ALJ’s construction of the claim term “oven;” (2) the ALJ’s construction of the claim term “sawing;” (3) the ALJ’s determination that the accused process does not infringe, either literally or under the doctrine of equivalents, claims 12, 15, 31-32, 34-35, and 38-39 of the ‘614 patent or claim 1 of the ‘942 patent; (4) the ALJ’s… [read post]
16 May 2011, 8:08 pm by The Legal Blog
Justice KG BalakrishnanThe Supreme Court in Selvi & Ors. v State of Karnataka has examined the law relating to the involuntary administration of certain scientific techniques, namely narcoanalysis, polygraph examination and the Brain Electrical Activation Profile (BEAP) test for the purpose of improving investigation efforts in criminal cases. [read post]
16 May 2011, 12:26 pm by Steve Hall
Although prosecutors must file a court notice when they intend to seek the death penalty, Pennsylvania's court system does not keep statistics on when the 67 county prosecutors do so. [read post]
15 May 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
The appeal was directed against the decision of an Examining Division (ED) to refuse the application under consideration.Claims 1, 4 and 8 before the ED were drafted as follows (English translation):1. [read post]
13 May 2011, 2:20 pm by Tomassi Law Associates
Remember, the allocation of your income should not be more than 35% towards the payments on your mortgage. [read post]
12 May 2011, 1:02 pm by Steve Bainbridge
Only 35% said they would refrain from trading because insider trading is wrong. [read post]