Search for: "Patently Yours"
Results 7181 - 7200
of 15,316
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Mar 2017, 12:45 pm
For you, the secondary category is the aesthetic and your real focus is functional and nonfunctional, and you could dispense with any reference to the aesthetic.Lemley: by aesthetic we might mean “something legitimately subject to an IP regime that isn’t patent. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 12:22 pm
The paper assesses the rules that govern preemption of what I term "state anti-patent laws": state laws that challenge or impede enforceability of federal patents. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
Please join the discussion by adding your comments on any of these stories, and please do let us know if you think we’ve missed something important, or if there is a source you think should be monitored. [read post]
2 May 2008, 7:00 am
Please join the discussion by adding your comments on any of these stories, and please do let me know if you think we’ve missed something important, or if there is a source you think should be monitored. [read post]
15 Feb 2007, 3:29 pm
Start your browser. 3. [read post]
23 Dec 2007, 8:00 pm
Please join the discussion by adding your comments on any of these stories, and please do let me know if you think we've missed something important, or if there is a source you think should be monitored. [read post]
9 Oct 2009, 1:28 pm
Get your weekend started with our first ever Fastcase Docket Review - a round-up of notable (and sometimes humorous) lawsuits filed around the country. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 9:56 pm
He has sweetly thanked the IPKat, who takes this opportunity to thank you all for your kindness in assisting him. [read post]
27 Dec 2007, 8:06 am
***A commenter to an earlier IPBiz post wrote:Whether that is a good or bad thing, the implication for ppl who write patent claims is pretty clear: don't put in a numerical limitation in your claims (either directly or through lexicographic language in the spec), unless there a specific, known prior art that requires it to be there. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 4:15 am
This provision precludes IPR on any patent once 12 months have elapsed after service of a complaint alleging infringement of that patent. [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 7:18 am
Please join the discussion by adding your comments on any of these stories, and please do let us know if you think we’ve missed something important, or if there is a source you think should be monitored. [read post]
14 Aug 2007, 5:21 am
If you want to (try to) make your voice heard, written comments must be received on or before October 9, 2007. [read post]
16 Apr 2009, 9:51 pm
Please join the discussion by adding your comments on any of these stories, and please do let us know if you think we’ve missed something important, or if there is a source you think should be monitored. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 12:46 pm
The post Accuracy Is Still Your Best Defense in California FCRA Matters appeared first on Ahead of the Class. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 5:10 am
The program also will include an opportunity to “Ask the Chief Judge” your questions. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 1:28 pm
Be safe out there and may your night be filled with more treats than tricks. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 10:43 am
Last week I attended the Association of Patent Law Firm's (APLF) Annual Meeting at the Hyatt Regency hotel in Chicago, IL. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 1:00 am
The event is hosted by Appleyard Lees, and open to all trainee patent attorneys, trainee trade mark attorneys, and trainee solicitors. [read post]
1 Oct 2023, 4:05 pm
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) recently issued a bulletin on the New Madrid Protocol webpages for international trademark applicants (govdelivery.com). [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 8:56 pm
Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”). [read post]
