Search for: "Short v. United States" Results 7181 - 7200 of 10,141
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Mar 2012, 3:00 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
United States, 690 F.2d 1368, 1370 (Fed. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 9:38 pm by Michael J.Z. Mannheimer
Solicitor General, argued that case for the United States, that leaves Montana one vote short for either overruling or distinguishing Citizens United. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 8:07 pm by Sam Eichner
On January 10, 2012, the Supreme Court of the United States heard oral arguments in Federal Communications Commission v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 9:17 am by Orin Kerr
Second, I will use the Supreme Court’s recent decision in United States v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 7:21 am
 In particular, the bill states: (b) EFFECTIVE DATE. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 7:13 am
United States) that threw everything into flux: My summary op-ed of the issue and my reasons for why Congress should just "do nothing. [read post]
3 Mar 2012, 12:41 pm by Lisa Milam-Perez
” The plaintiffs also tried to no avail to distinguish the challenged rule from the NLRB’s regulation defining appropriate bargaining units in acute-care hospitals, which was upheld by the Supreme Court in American Hospital Ass’n v NLRB. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 8:16 pm
Question #5 – Business Visa (B1) If from a foreign country, but I have invested in a United States based business, can I apply for a business (B-1) visa? [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 7:58 am by John Elwood
United States, 11-5683, and Hill v. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 1:59 am
German epidemiologists initially thought including sprouts would only create false positives in case/control studies because sprouts, in general, are so common a food item.A CDC-FDA-state investigation of a similar outbreak here in the United States would focus more quickly on sprouts given the long history of sprout outbreaks. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 2:06 pm by Orin Kerr
United States, 436 U.S. 128, 130-43 (1978); United States v. [read post]