Search for: "THE UNITED STATES et al" Results 7181 - 7200 of 8,486
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Nov 2009, 1:06 pm by Lyle Denniston
In a reply brief filed in Rasul, et al., v. [read post]
21 Nov 2009, 1:36 pm
Thursday we began a series on the Second Circuit of Court of Appeals decision in United States v. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 12:05 pm by Erin Miller
Opinion below (Virginia Supreme Court) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner's reply Amicus Brief of the Virginia Assoc. of Commonwealth's Attorneys, et al. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 5:00 am
This is the first in a series of posts on United States v. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 4:01 pm by Keith Rizzardi
Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), present an updated list of plant and animal species native to the United States that we regard as candidates for or have proposed for addition to the Lists of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants under the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended. [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 10:44 pm
At least we were able to insert a Saboteur from Academia into the United States Patent and Trademark Office. [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 8:00 am
Culliver (09-158) - originally Conference 11.6 [involves lawyers from Akin Gump and Howe & Russell] United States Defense Department v. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 3:00 pm by Sheppard Mullin
., B-401596, et al, Sept. 21, 2009, the GAO sustained a protest against the pre-qualification of a vendor on the grounds that the Department of State’s (DOS) determination that the vendor satisfied the qualification requirements of the Omnibus Diplomatic Security and Antiterrorism Act of 1986 (Security Act) was unreasonable. [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 5:52 pm by Rick
Phillips, et al, “New Standard for ‘Move-Aways’ in Child Custody Battles” (October 29, 2009) Daily Journal, p. 6.) [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 11:12 am
Monday, the Supreme Court will hear one hour of oral argument in Bilski, et al., v. [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 8:09 am
  My starting point was to agree with that, particularly given my general agreement with those who have argued that the conduct of Yoo et al was unethical. [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 3:21 am
(Excess Copyright) Bill C-61 and DRM: How the Canadian Constitution ensures a balance of copyrights (IP Osgoode) Counterfeit goods: Statutory and punitive damages: Microsoft Corporation v 1276916 Ontario Ltd et al (Canadian Trademark Blog) Denmark DRM breaker reports himself to anti-piracy group (TorrentFreak) Europe Pirate Party gets second seat in European Parliament (TorrentFreak) (IP Watch) File-sharers protected under proposed EU legislation - Deadlock broken on Telecoms… [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 3:21 am
(Excess Copyright) Bill C-61 and DRM: How the Canadian Constitution ensures a balance of copyrights (IP Osgoode) Counterfeit goods: Statutory and punitive damages: Microsoft Corporation v 1276916 Ontario Ltd et al (Canadian Trademark Blog)   Denmark DRM breaker reports himself to anti-piracy group (TorrentFreak)   Europe Pirate Party gets second seat in European Parliament (TorrentFreak) (IP Watch) File-sharers protected under proposed EU legislation – Deadlock… [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 3:21 am
(Excess Copyright) Bill C-61 and DRM: How the Canadian Constitution ensures a balance of copyrights (IP Osgoode) Counterfeit goods: Statutory and punitive damages: Microsoft Corporation v 1276916 Ontario Ltd et al (Canadian Trademark Blog)   Denmark DRM breaker reports himself to anti-piracy group (TorrentFreak)   Europe Pirate Party gets second seat in European Parliament (TorrentFreak) (IP Watch) File-sharers protected under proposed EU legislation –… [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 7:46 pm
United States (08-1595) – originally Conference 10.30 Noriega v. [read post]