Search for: "Bills v. State" Results 7201 - 7220 of 21,859
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Mar 2020, 3:40 am by Edith Roberts
The first is in Seila Law v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 5:26 am by Rosalind English
R (on the application of Cart) (Appellant) v The Upper Tribunal (Respondent); R (on the application of MR (Pakistan)) (FC) (Appellant) v The Upper Tribunal (Immigration & Asylum Chamber) and Secretary of State for the Home Department (Respondent) [2011] UKSC 28, 22/6/2011 – read judgment; press summary here Unappealable decisions of the Upper Tribunal are still subject to judicial review by the High Court, but only… [read post]
20 Sep 2016, 4:55 am by Edith Roberts
Yesterday, Chief Justice John Roberts, Justice Stephen Breyer, and Justice Samuel Alito, along with several jurists from the United Kingdom visiting the United States as part of a legal exchange program, participated in a reenactment of a 1794 Supreme Court case, Georgia v. [read post]
2 Aug 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
While states’ rights often involved slavery and white supremacy, states’ rights and state sovereignty were also invoked to defend the rights of northern citizens to resist efforts to enforce the Fugitive Slave laws. [read post]
19 May 2019, 4:08 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Murray Rankin, stated during the debate on June 16, 2016, The safeguards in the bill reflect many things. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 2:46 am by SHG
This title phrase, glommed from the non-precedential decision of the Third Circuit in State Troopers v. [read post]
17 Mar 2012, 12:51 pm by Jim Gerl
  In later installments, I have discussed the seminal decision of TK & SK ex rel LK v. [read post]
10 Oct 2007, 10:22 pm
Plaintiffs' attorneys Jesse Forbes, Bill Forbes and Roger Decanio state they are "pleased" with the verdict. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 4:31 am by Edith Roberts
The first is United States v. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 4:41 am by Susan Brenner
DeGraffenreid explained to Moore that she `got on the computer to pay some bills and ... found some disturbing files that she thought was child pornography. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
” [See, also, Matter of Council of School Supervisors & Adm'rs, Local 1 v New York City Dept. of Educ., 87 AD3d 883, an entity not a party to a collective bargaining agreement negotiated pursuant to the Taylor Law may not be bound by its terms.]* See Governor’s Program Bill Mem, Bill Jacket, Chapter 504 of the Laws of, 2009 ** Civil Service Law § 209-a [1] [e]*** Matter of City of Oswego, 21 NY3d 880; Matter of City of Yonkers v Yonkers… [read post]