Search for: "Defendants A-F"
Results 7201 - 7220
of 29,832
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jun 2018, 2:04 pm
Thus, in Malesko the Court held that corporate defendants may not be held liable in Bivens actions. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 10:58 am
Sears, Roebuck & Co., 624 F.3d 842 (7th Cir. 2010), wrote a blistering opinion that discussed the extortionate nature of class action suits and is likely to be frequently quoted extensively by defense counsel in the future. [read post]
20 May 2009, 2:36 am
Restrepo-Contreras, 942 F.2d 96, 99 (1st Cir. 1991). [read post]
22 Mar 2014, 5:23 pm
The Family Court then dismissed the branches of the neglect petitions alleging that the defendant mother neglected child A and derivatively neglected the other children in allowing child A to fall out of a window in her apartment. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 9:02 pm
George, 975 F.2d 72, 75 (2d Cir. 1992). [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 9:19 am
Plastipak Packaging, Inc., 415 F.3d 1335 (Fed. [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 3:14 pm
McGaw, Inc., 149 F.3d 1321, 1327 (Fed. [read post]
17 Apr 2010, 8:34 am
Bouchard, 347 F.3d 1299, 1307 (Fed. [read post]
17 Apr 2010, 8:34 am
Bouchard, 347 F.3d 1299, 1307 (Fed. [read post]
29 Jun 2022, 2:55 pm
” 183 F. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 6:50 am
April 23, 2009), the defendant challenged his sentence for possession with intent to distribute more than 5 grams of crack cocaine. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 4:42 pm
See Zinser, 253 F.3d at 541-42; In re Paxil, 212 F.R.D. at 542-44. [read post]
2 Oct 2007, 5:28 am
Marino, 658 F.2d 1120, 1123 (6th Cir. 1981); .... [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 5:45 am
Defendant: Yes, I do.U.S. v. [read post]
2 Jun 2021, 7:51 am
However, if it does so, it is a deviation from the basic statutory formula and requires an analysis under the factors set forth in Domestic Relations Law § 240(1–b)(f). [read post]
11 Aug 2007, 7:10 am
" Davis, 482 F.2d at 913. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 7:33 am
" Lindow, 738 F.2d at 1063. [read post]
4 Oct 2008, 6:20 pm
Acosta, 303 F.3d at 85-86. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 11:56 am
Specifically, the defendant objected to the admission of questions and testimony about whether the defendant’s father warned members of the church about the defendant’s potential dangerousness. [read post]
31 Aug 2018, 11:59 am
The following are strict Rule 11 requirements federal judges must adhere to when accepting guilty pleas, especially those conditioned on agreements with the Government: Rule 11(b)(1) (B-F) requires the court to convey to the defendant that by pleading guilty they waive the following rights: right to a jury trial; right against self-incrimination; the right to maintain previously entered not guilty plea; the right to testify at a trial, the right to compel the appearance of… [read post]
