Search for: "State v. Burden"
Results 7201 - 7220
of 22,210
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 May 2019, 9:01 pm
Support for Roe v. [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 11:41 am
In Weingarten v. [read post]
23 Aug 2007, 2:34 pm
State of California, the court of appeal held that employers, not employees, had the burden of proof on this issue. [read post]
11 Oct 2006, 5:30 am
., LLC v. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 5:03 am
In Matter of Chinese Staff and Workers Association v. [read post]
28 Dec 2020, 12:20 pm
In Tanzin v. [read post]
26 Feb 2025, 2:41 am
In United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 4:03 am
McMinn v. [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 4:00 am
” Further, the individual seeking such a hearing carries the burden of proof and must show the “stigmatizing nature” of the information and its publication to the public. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 1:20 pm
In a 2021 case, Gamboa v. [read post]
19 Apr 2014, 7:31 pm
In Kirby v. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 5:30 am
A discrepancy between the contemporaneous incident reports and the applicant’s testimony at the subsequent hearing presents a credibility issue to be resolved by the hearing officerBevilacqua v DiNapoli, 2016 NY Slip Op 07077, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentPolice Captain Larry A. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 6:28 am
But he may not.The case is Vincent v. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 4:00 am
The Supreme Court denied the petition and the Association appealed.The Appellate Division, noting that a party seeking to overturn an arbitration on one or more of the grounds stated in CPLR 7511(b)(1) "bears a heavy burden," and, citing Matter of New York City Tr. [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 4:09 am
The Comptroller affirmed the Hearing Officer’s determination stating, in part, that Gilleshad "failed to sustain his burden of proving that he [was] eligible to have included in the calculation of his final average salary those payments received for services rendered to private entities and for which the employer [was] reimbursed by the private entities. [read post]
21 Aug 2024, 6:00 am
Petitioner's application was denied by the New York State Retirement System [System] based on its finding that the incidents did not constitute accidents within the meaning of Retirement and Social Security Law §363.* Noting that an applicant accidental disability retirement benefits bares the burden of establishing that his disability arose from an accident within the meaning of the Retirement and Social Security Law, and that the System's determination in… [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 4:00 am
In New Doe Child #1 v. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 2:39 pm
V. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 9:20 am
In Willingboro Mall v. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 9:15 am
The current case, Murithi v. [read post]
