Search for: "State v. Money"
Results 7201 - 7220
of 20,528
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 May 2025, 7:46 am
That said, the Court of Appeal for Ontario’s recent decision in Bertsch v. [read post]
9 Jul 2024, 3:20 pm
Henning v. [read post]
24 Apr 2025, 6:41 am
” “Clients lost money because the development failed and they have been reimbursed by Mr Mian’s insurers. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 6:24 am
A case kicking around back them was United States v. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 4:30 am
That doctrine allows for suits for equitable relief against state officials, but Young does not allow for even equitable relief, much less money damages, against the State sued in its own name. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 4:00 am
In Bostock v. [read post]
15 Feb 2023, 5:21 pm
., Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jan 2013, 6:32 am
Commonwealth v. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 10:35 am
The Travelers policy at issue stated as follows: Computer crime Computer fraud The Company will pay the insured for the Insured’s direct loss of, or direct loss from damage to, money, securities and other property directly caused by computer fraud. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 8:50 am
Supreme Court in 2004 ruled in Rumsfeld v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 4:25 am
In Perry v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 4:22 am
In Perry v. [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 9:42 am
The Supreme Court granted a Writ of Certiorari on March 26, 2007 in the case of Stoneridge Investment Partners LLC v. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 3:51 am
Indeed, in State v. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 7:51 am
Co. v Batista, 165 AD3d 997, 998; Doviak v Finkelstein &Partners, LLP, 90 AD3d 696, 699; Quinn v Walsh, 18 AD3d 638; Brill v Friends World Coll., 133 AD2d 729). [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 10:06 am
The Supreme Court issued its landmark opinion in Citizens United v. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 4:10 am
Prasco v. [read post]
20 Sep 2024, 6:00 am
The court also found that the information was exempt from disclosure under the cybersecurity exemption, noting that the Court of Appeals has explained that although FOIL is "'liberally construed and its exemptions narrowly interpreted'" to achieve its legislative purpose of maximizing public access to government records, "Courts must give an exemption its "natural and obvious meaning where such interpretation is consistent with the legislative intent and with the… [read post]
20 Sep 2024, 6:00 am
The court also found that the information was exempt from disclosure under the cybersecurity exemption, noting that the Court of Appeals has explained that although FOIL is "'liberally construed and its exemptions narrowly interpreted'" to achieve its legislative purpose of maximizing public access to government records, "Courts must give an exemption its "natural and obvious meaning where such interpretation is consistent with the legislative intent and with the… [read post]
22 Aug 2019, 6:56 am
As held by the Supreme Court in SEC v. [read post]
