Search for: "US v. West" Results 7201 - 7220 of 8,407
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Feb 2010, 7:00 am by Guy Mundlak
Both of us read the literature on the East/West and North/South divides, patterns of migration, and global chains of production and care as matters that can no longer be relegated to the old conflicts of communism v. capitalism. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 9:05 pm by Gianna Hill
Supreme Court’s decision in West Virginia v. [read post]
9 Jan 2006, 4:42 pm
In 1973, the Supreme Court attempted to define obscenity in Miller v. [read post]
25 Oct 2006, 10:10 pm
Eric also cites a recent case from the Federal District Court for the Southern District of Ohio where the court reached the same conclusion as in the Axciom case (Key v. [read post]
9 Jun 2020, 11:09 am by Jonathan Bailey
Much of this gold rush was spurned on by a May 2007 ruling in the case of Perfect 10 v. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
Marshall saw it as a broad and sweeping power granted to chief executives so they could act mercifully.That case, United States v. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 3:10 pm by Abbott & Kindermann
Hart The most recent California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) case on selecting a project baseline is Sunnyvale West Neighborhood Assn., et al. v. [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 5:01 am by Lindsay F. Wiley, Steve Vladeck
And in an unpublished 2011 opinion, the U.S Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit upheld West Virginia’s school vacc [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 6:48 pm by Bryn Miller
California Assembly Bill (AB) 5, which Governor Gavin Newsom signed in late 2019, codified into law the landmark California Supreme Court ruling in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Aug 2011, 2:41 am by 1 Crown Office Row
  In relation to sentencing in the Crown Court, there was some Court of Appeal authority on sentencing which arose from riots in Bradford, West Yorkshire back in 2001 – see R v Chapman 2002 and R v Najeeb 2003. [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 5:59 am by Menachem Z. Rosensaft
These are the folks who would want to roll back segregation, for whom Loving v. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 10:35 am by Schachtman
”  GAF alleged that this “memorandum, apparently created for use in preparing asbestos plaintiffs for deposition, improperly exhorts witnesses to testify in a pre-scripted manner, regardless of the truth. [read post]