Search for: "1-8 Doe"
Results 7221 - 7240
of 32,316
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2009, 8:12 am
They're yours and yours alone (unless the created work has been a collaborative effort).(8) Exclusively. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 7:30 am
Here are a few examples (with spoilers largely avoided): 1. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 7:27 pm
Decedent and his wife of 42 years were divorced on January 8, 2004. [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 12:57 pm
Jul. 1, 2015). [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 10:40 am
If “implicit in ordered liberty” means something other than “understood to be off the table,” what does it mean and how does that lead to “legislative facts” and so on? [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 7:28 pm
But it does bring more people into the courthouse. [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 8:31 pm
See J.A. 181; see also Appellant’s Br. 25 n.1. [read post]
21 Dec 2018, 9:02 am
What does that mean? [read post]
17 Mar 2020, 11:29 am
Much of the rest of the decision is devoted to the correct way to perform the likelihood of confusion test of Art. 8(1)(b) Regulation 207/2009 [now superseded by art. 9(2)(b) Regulation 2017/1001, the EU Trade Mark Regulation]. [read post]
21 Dec 2018, 9:02 am
What does that mean? [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 7:47 am
Here is my list: 1. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 11:58 am
Does the word “facially” modify only “legitimate,” or does it modify both the words “legitimate and bona fide”? [read post]
19 Aug 2015, 2:57 pm
However, CPLR §510(1) provides that the "court, upon motion, may change the place of trial of an action where: the county designated for that purpose is not a proper county. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 11:57 am
Today, the Supreme Court ruled (8-1) that merely adding ".com" to a generic term may allow the combination to be protected as a non-generic trademark. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 7:37 pm
1. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 5:00 am
Does it change how courts should decide federalism cases? [read post]
6 Jan 2017, 4:22 pm
8. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 7:57 am
See section 35B(8). [read post]
27 Jul 2018, 2:30 pm
More significant is Judge Leineweber's ruling against the first condition, which mandates compliance with 8 U.S.C. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 9:37 am
” Pet. 7–8. [read post]
