Search for: "Cross v. State" Results 7221 - 7240 of 16,708
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Nov 2015, 6:00 am
For example, assertions can reflect a state of mind versus an assertion of truth. [read post]
18 Nov 2015, 6:00 am
For example, assertions can reflect a state of mind versus an assertion of truth. [read post]
17 Nov 2015, 6:18 am by Joy Waltemath
The court denied the employer’s petition for review and granted the Board’s cross-application for enforcement of its decision finding that the company’s refusal to reinstate the striking workers was an unfair labor practice (Spurlino Materials, LLC v. [read post]
17 Nov 2015, 6:00 am
For example, assertions can reflect a state of mind versus an assertion of truth. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 9:45 am by EEM
Events:Seminar: Clandestine Crossings in the Aegean Sea: Border Transgressions and Exclusions, London, 25 November 2015 [info]Conference: Frontex: Legal Questions and Current Controversies, Luxembourg, 27 November 2015 [info]Publications:Another 3 Million Refugees? [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 6:58 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
As the Court tells us in this case, "Reeves prevents courts from imposing a per se rule requiring in all instances that a claimant offer more than a prima facie case and evidence of pretext" (citing Cross v. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 5:29 am
For example, assertions can reflect a state of mind versus an assertion of truth. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 4:00 am by Administrator
À bon droit Susan on the SoapboxPOTUS Kills Keystone XL On Friday Barack Obama refused to issue a presidential permit allowing TCPL’s Keystone XL pipeline to cross the border between Canada and the United States. [read post]
15 Nov 2015, 8:38 am
For example, assertions can reflect a state of mind versus an assertion of truth. [read post]
14 Nov 2015, 9:35 am
For example, assertions can reflect a state of mind versus an assertion of truth. [read post]
14 Nov 2015, 7:30 am
 On cross motions for summary judgment Supreme Court granted judgment to State Farm and plaintiffs appealed. [read post]
14 Nov 2015, 5:18 am by Elina Saxena
Tim Edgar provided his final thoughts on reforming surveillance and European privacy rules in light of the European Court of Justice’s ruling in Schrems v. [read post]
13 Nov 2015, 9:05 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Prior to trial, in an order dated August 26, 2004, the Supreme Court determined that the County was collaterally estopped from arguing that the road was not negligently designed based upon prior decisions of this Court in Furino v County of Nassau and Zawacki v County of Nassau. [read post]
13 Nov 2015, 11:19 am by Patrick E. Knie
The guardian also named the state department of transportation as a defendant in the suit, averring that it had failed to properly inspect the crossing and had installed the stop sign and stop line in the wrong places. [read post]