Search for: "Davis v. Davis" Results 7221 - 7240 of 8,261
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Oct 2011, 5:58 am by Steve McConnell
The defendants filed a motion to dismiss and the Judge made a nod in the direction of Twombly and its requirement that the plaintiff supply "'enough details about the subject matter of the case to present a story that holds together.'" Cardenas, slip op. at 4, quoting Estate of Davis v. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 11:09 am by Steve Vladeck
” When the Supreme Court returns to the bench next Monday morning to hear argument in Ayestas v. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 10:10 am
However the CPS guidance quotes "DPP v McKeown, DPP v Jones ([1997] 2Cr App R, 155, HL at page 163) [where] Lord Hoffman defined a computer as "a device for storing, processing and retrieving information". [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 8:42 am by Lyle Denniston
Turning back to a 1994 ruling, in Davis v. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
The recent injunction row, PJS v NGN is in many ways a sequel to the 2011 blockbuster – CTB v NGN and Thomas – set in the Super Injunction Spring, the story of Imogen Thomas, a former Miss Wales who had an affair with the Premier League footballer Ryan Giggs. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 8:50 am by Steve Hall
Wicomico County State's Attorney Davis R. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 3:52 am
A more usual decision from the 6th is US v. [read post]
29 Sep 2024, 12:25 am by Frank Cranmer
Higgs v Farmor’s School The appeal in Higgs v Farmor’s School (Religion and belief – direct discrimination) [2023] EAT 89 is being live-streamed on Wednesday and Thursday. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 5:55 am
Verret (George Mason University), on Thursday, April 25, 2019 Tags: Conflicts of interest, Disclosure, Institutional Investors, Proxy advisors, Retail investors, SEC, Securities regulation, Shareholder proposals, Shareholder voting, Surveys MFW Compliance in Controller-led transaction Olenik v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 3:15 am by Lyle Denniston
It may encourage further debate in the legal academy about the future of New York Times v. [read post]