Search for: "Doe Officers"
Results 7221 - 7240
of 137,042
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Aug 2016, 1:39 pm
A police officer is permitted to turn a routine traffic stop into a DUI investigation if there is specific evidence that the driver is impaired and the process does not take too long. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 8:32 am
The Court of Appeals does not see it that way.The case is Outlaw v. [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 5:00 am
(Does the celery in a Bloody Mary count as breakfast?) [read post]
17 Aug 2024, 3:35 am
” Absent something indicating to the officer that the permit might not have been facially valid, or some other evidence of criminality or danger to the officer, we agree with Soukaneh. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 4:10 am
As such, holding the position does not require taking an oath of office or providing any written statements.Oddly, in 2009, Harris County went before the 1st Court of Appeals to argue that Sanchez was a judicial officer and as such could not be barred from performing an autopsy opposed by the deceased’s family for religious reasons.Harris County was joined in its position by Tarrant, Dallas, Bexar, El Paso and other medical examiner counties. [read post]
7 Apr 2008, 2:18 am
For example, Dallas County has a PD office (which supplements private appointments), but Tarrant County does not. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 7:56 am
Does she look 73? [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 3:30 am
Therefore, if the office is closed for a snow day and the non-exempt employee does not work, the employee does not get paid. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 3:30 am
How does one determine whether an employee with a disability is “qualified”? [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 4:49 pm
President Trump first 50 days in office : reality check! [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 10:54 pm
But seriously, does an employer really have to be concerned about what happens at an employee’s wedding? [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 5:35 am
But she does know that she has the right to video police in the performance of their public duties. [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 8:32 am
The court reinstated the claims because they believe the plaintiff alleged enough facts to demonstrate the loyalty oath and her religious beliefs are in conflict and the state office does not face undue hardship in granting the plaintiff’s accommodation request to alter the oath. [read post]
5 Jun 2008, 2:49 am
The Connecticut Attorney General's Office quietly filed suit this week in Connecticut State Court(download here) against American Future Systems, which does business under the name of Progressive Business Publications (and also Progressive Business Compliance). [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 7:28 am
Prosecutors at the ICC have determined that they lack jurisdiction to investigate crimes allegedly committed in Gaza, reasoning that Palestine does not constitute a “state” for purposes of Article 12 of the Rome Statute and hence cannot confer jurisdiction on the ICC (leaving only the option of a UN Security Council referral, which of course has not happened in this instance). [read post]
26 May 2021, 8:26 am
The city does not comment on pending litigation, and it remains to be seen how this case will play out. [read post]
3 Jan 2016, 3:44 am
Young black men were nine times more likely than other Americans to be killed by police officers in 2015, according to the findings of a Guardian study that recorded a final tally of 1,134 deaths at the hands of law enforcement officers this year. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 4:00 am
However, notwithstanding the privacy issues raised by this technological shift, eaccess implies transforming the role of court offices from that of a simple custodian of court records to that of a publisher of sorts. [read post]
Good to know: The US trademark office has a ‘proof of use’ audit program for trademark registrations
11 Jan 2019, 10:17 am
If the response does not include acceptable proof of use for, or merely deletes the audited goods or services, the USPTO will issue a second office action requiring proof of use for all of the remaining goods or services in your registration for which you have not provided proof of use, and set a deadline for responding to the second office action. [read post]
Good to know: The US trademark office has a ‘proof of use’ audit program for trademark registrations
11 Jan 2019, 10:17 am
If the response does not include acceptable proof of use for, or merely deletes the audited goods or services, the USPTO will issue a second office action requiring proof of use for all of the remaining goods or services in your registration for which you have not provided proof of use, and set a deadline for responding to the second office action. [read post]
