Search for: "Does 1 to 10" Results 7221 - 7240 of 42,984
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Sep 2007, 7:20 am
September 10, 2007), a split panel of the Court of Appeals reversed its prior decision in United States v. [read post]
1 May 2024, 4:19 am by SHG
Judiciary Law $ 7 51(1). [read post]
2 Oct 2018, 9:17 am by Raven Moore
(b) No later than the close of the 2021 calendar year, a publicly held domestic or foreign corporation whose principal executive offices, according to the corporation’s SEC 10-K form, are located in California shall comply with the following: (1) If its number of directors is six or more, the corporation shall have a minimum of three female directors. (2) If its number of directors is five, the corporation shall have a minimum of two female directors.… [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 8:29 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
It does not affirmatively incorporateany information. (...)Because Perski ’808 does not incorporate byreference the anticipatory subject matter from Morag, theITC’s finding that Perski ’455 anticipates claim 10 of the’607 patent lacks substantial evidence.Having resolved that Perski ’455 is prior art forclaims 1–7 of the ’607 patent, we conclude that substantialevidence supports the ITC’s finding that Perski… [read post]
27 Jul 2021, 8:58 am by Gritsforbreakfast
The program never seems to work, though, whether they monitor three data points or 10. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 5:30 am
In answering the demands of right holders, it does not matter whether an intermediary misbehaved. [read post]
27 Jan 2025, 8:03 am by Marcel Pemsel
Further, design law does not know the concept of dilution and Versuni took action against designs with the same overall impression. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 6:18 pm by John Elwood
American Atheists (relisted after the 9/26, 10/7, and (probably) 10/14 Conferences) Docket:  10-1276 Issue(s):  (1) Which Establishment Clause test should be applied when analyzing passive public displays; (2) does the Establishment Clause forbid roadside memorial crosses marking the site of death for state highway troopers killed in the line of duty; and (3) is a collection of memorials owned by a private organization, disclaimed by the state,… [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 2:25 pm by Francis Pileggi
Relying primarily on Section 212(a) was a “strange move”, because that section does not authorize or restrict anything, the vice chancellor said. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 4:23 am by Matthew Lerner
  The Court noted that the key to sec. 240(1) liability was shielding the injured worker from harm directly flowing from the application of the force of gravity to an object or person.The Court held that the relevant inquiry in a falling object case is whether the harm flows directly from the application of the force of gravity to the object; it does not depend upon whether the object has hit the worker.What about the elevation level being de minimis? [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 7:00 am
If you or someone you love has been accused of a crime in California, contact the experienced Orange County criminal defense attorneys at Wallin & Klarich today at 1-888-280-6839 or www.wklaw.com for a consultation of your case. [read post]
14 May 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
On May 1, 2023, the Delaware Court of Chancery addressed an unsettled question under Delaware law—whether a fully informed, uncoerced vote of disinterested stockholders (so-called “Corwin cleansing”[1]) can be applied to defeat claims to enjoin defensive measures under Unocal Corp. v. [read post]
25 Oct 2007, 2:17 pm
It really does reward reading and so we should just suggest you go and read it for yourselves. [read post]
4 Oct 2012, 2:59 pm
Section 50-e (1) requires that the notice be served within 90 days after the claim arises. [read post]