Search for: "Goode v. State"
Results 7221 - 7240
of 44,768
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 May 2013, 6:25 am
Thaler, in an opinion by Justice Breyer (but announced by Justice Kennedy, because Justice Breyer was absent), the Court held by a vote of five to four that when a state’s procedural framework, by reason of its design and operation, makes it highly unlikely in a typical case that a defendant will have a meaningful opportunity to raise on direct appeal a claim that his trial counsel provided ineffective assistance, the good cause exception recognized in… [read post]
28 Aug 2018, 1:20 pm
In addition to brick-and-mortar stores, Via Varejo has utilized the Casas Bahia brand in e-commerce since 2009, operating under the domain name casasbahia.com.br (the Casas Bahia Website).Via Varejo does not operate any physical Casas Bahia stores in the United States and does not ship goods ordered online to the United States, although millions of Internet Protocol (IP) addresses located in the United States access the Casas Bahia Website every year. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 12:12 pm
Fresenius USA, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 8:03 am
However, the recent case of Sean Morrison Entertainment v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 1:37 pm
"FunnyJunk v. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 11:08 am
Co. v. [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 3:30 pm
The court stated a broker must act in the customer’s best interests and must refrain from self-dealing, and that these obligations are at times described “as fiduciary duties of good faith, fair dealing, and loyalty. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 4:27 pm
The Grand Chamber stated in Cumpana v Romania on 17 December 2004 at paragraph 91, in the context of a publication covered by Article 10, that Article 8 “may require the adoption of positive measures designed to secure effective respect for private life even in the sp [read post]
10 May 2007, 2:29 pm
In the Federal Tort Claims Act, Congress waived the sovereign immunity of the United States (and thus created the possibility of damages) for the "negligent or wrongful act or omission of any employee of the Government while acting within the scope of his office or employment, under circumstances where the United States, if a private person, would be liable to the claimant in accordance with the law of the place where the act or omission occurred. [read post]
28 Aug 2013, 10:28 am
By Eric Goldman Evans v. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 11:55 am
By Eric Goldman Paul v. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 11:35 am
However, in North Carolina v. [read post]
18 Dec 2024, 12:57 pm
All that matters is whether the government can imagine a good reason for the taking. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 10:30 am
Fadwa Hammoud is the solicitor general of the state of Michigan, which joined an amicus brief on behalf of the petitioner in June Medical Services v. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 5:08 am
" then chances are good that you have difficulty coming up with a principled objection to Prop. 8. [read post]
9 Jan 2010, 10:02 pm
United States v. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 7:42 am
Doeff v. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 12:24 pm
Article 13(1) ... has to be interpreted in such a way that it does not exclude Member States from providing for the possibility that the customs authorities also formally initiate the proceedings mentioned in the provision themselves".This is good news for the Estonian Customs folk, who can now get on with their day jobs without worrying about the need for tedious court proceedings before determining that infringing goods are coming into the country. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 3:04 pm
If you are a U.S. mariner and find yourself injured while onboard a vessel it’s always a good idea to find a good Jones Act lawyer by state. [read post]
3 Mar 2016, 11:21 am
United States, 459 F.2d 631, 635 (9th Cir. 1972); see also, Black v. [read post]
