Search for: "Held v. State" Results 7221 - 7240 of 82,195
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jul 2011, 8:32 am by Zachary Spilman
CAAF published its opinion in U.S. v. [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 9:41 am by CJLF Staff
In 2000, the Eleventh Circuit held in Joel v. [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 2:53 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
The court held that a caseworker ought to have followed the Process Instruction and requested the appellant to provide statements which covered the additional 6 days of the 28-day period. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 7:57 pm by John W. Arden
Thus, the court held that the Board of Health exceeded its authority under Boreali v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 8:33 am by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) A commenter on the thread about the 1901 case in which the court rejected (on statutory grounds) a prosecution for expelling someone from church based on how he voted writes: It goes almost without saying that religious freedom was not at issue in this case because the First Amendment would not be incorporated against the states until Gitlow v. [read post]
3 Jan 2007, 6:24 am
The 9th first held that the element of "domestic relationship" did not have to be listed in the state statute. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 12:53 pm by Tejinder Singh
Kavanaugh didn’t get into the weeds in Seven-Sky, but instead stated his view of the law plainly: “Under the Constitution, the President may decline to enforce a statute that regulates private individuals when the President deems the statute unconstitutional, even if a court has held or would hold the statute constitutional. [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 11:29 am by Brianna Perrone and Thomas Urban
Azcarate to release copies of transcripts relating to the Depp v. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 4:56 am by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
On March 1, 2017, the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit (“First Circuit”) held in Rodríguez-López v. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 9:07 am by Tom Webley
On June 23, 2014, the Supreme Court of the United States issued its much-anticipated decision in Halliburton Co., et al. v. [read post]