Search for: "High v State" Results 7221 - 7240 of 35,518
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 May 2020, 4:40 am by Elizabeth Kruska
This is not the dam we're talking about.TransCanada Hydro Northeast Inc. v. [read post]
13 May 2020, 3:46 am by Edith Roberts
Washington and Colorado Department of State v. [read post]
13 May 2020, 3:22 am by Jan von Hein
Written by Yannick Morath Yannick Morath, doctoral candidate at the University of Freiburg, has kindly provided us with his thoughts on the CJEU’s judgement in the case of LG and Others v Rina SpA, Ente Registro Italiano Navale (C-641/18 – ECLI:EU:C:2020:349) (See also the earlier post by Matthias Weller concerning the CJEU’s judgement). [read post]
13 May 2020, 1:02 am by CMS
Mr Harris QC refers to Mastercard’s admissions in relation to the Sainsbury’s case, that there will have been pass on at the high end of the scale according to its expert. [read post]
12 May 2020, 6:30 pm by Ilya Somin
They compare it to Clinton Administration Solicitor General Drew Days' famous mistake in United States v. [read post]
12 May 2020, 3:23 pm by Amy Howe
Strawbridge conceded that the House at least theoretically has the power to subpoena the president’s personal papers, although such a subpoena would have to meet a high standard. [read post]
12 May 2020, 1:57 pm by Derek T. Muller
States have the power to determine the qualifications of voters; there’s a plausible argument that includes the power to enforce qualifications, as the Supreme Court suggested in Arizona v. [read post]
12 May 2020, 4:53 am by Brook Fulks
In October 2019, the Texas Supreme Court held in Highsmith v. [read post]
12 May 2020, 4:00 am by Charlotte Butash
Trump filed an application for a stay with the Supreme Court, which the high court granted and treated as a writ of certiorari, which it also granted. [read post]
12 May 2020, 3:53 am by CMS
The appeal in the matter of Mastercard Incorporated and others v Walter Hugh Merricks CBE has been adjusted in listing this week and will now commence from 10am tomorrow, Wednesday 13 May 2020. [read post]
11 May 2020, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Last week, the Supreme Court unanimously reversed their convictions.Writing for the Court in Kelly v. [read post]
11 May 2020, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
He reaffirmed the Court of Appeal’s finding in Campbell v MGN Ltd [2002] EWCA Civ 1373 that the defendant’s state of mind is irrelevant to the tort of misuse of private information. [read post]
11 May 2020, 3:41 pm by Amy Howe
Rassbach pointed to some of the roles described in the court’s 2012 ruling in Hosanna-Tabor Lutheran Church v. [read post]
11 May 2020, 1:29 pm by Lisa Ellefsen
What constitutes an electronic signature and whether such signatures are valid in South Africa has become a question of increasing importance given the high likelihood of restricted movement for the coming future. [read post]