Search for: "STATE V. POWERS"
Results 7221 - 7240
of 41,391
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Aug 2010, 6:21 am
” In State Farm v Privacy Commissioner, the State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. questioned the privacy commissioner’s jurisdiction to investigate a refusal to provide access to personal information and her power to compel the production of documents during the course of an investigation. [read post]
17 May 2010, 10:14 am
The Court has previously held that mandating state legislatures (in New York v. [read post]
5 Jun 2016, 11:03 am
NSAHepting v. [read post]
6 May 2019, 6:12 am
Dohme v. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 12:29 pm
Douglas v. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 6:15 pm
Here is the abstract: In a recent case, Virginia v. [read post]
24 Aug 2013, 2:52 am
State Farm Mut. [read post]
19 Sep 2007, 9:34 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
19 Sep 2007, 5:33 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
16 Dec 2023, 9:36 am
More recently, David Super has emerged as the academy’s leading critic of the “Convention of States” campaign and of Article V convention drives in general. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 5:28 am
By Stevie Phillips In State v. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 5:28 am
By Stevie Phillips In State v. [read post]
9 Feb 2022, 1:32 pm
Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians v. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 5:00 am
Additionally, the USPTO states that an invention is defined in its claims and not by its specification. [read post]
2 Mar 2022, 2:33 pm
As I have made crystal clear the United States and our Allies will defend every inch of territory of NATO countries with the full force of our collective power. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 8:59 pm
" This provision allocates to the states the power how to run their presidential elections. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 2:08 pm
See United States v. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 12:00 am
" The IJ brief notes that the eminent domain power is particularly suceptible to abuse in those states where blight is a very elastic term. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 1:04 pm
C068747 Drake v. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 8:49 pm
Holder, and Sissel v. [read post]
