Search for: "State v. David."
Results 7221 - 7240
of 14,237
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Feb 2014, 10:46 am
By: David R. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 8:31 am
The case, Castolenia v. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 4:17 am
Many states have legal rules that call for religious exemptions from generally applicable state and local laws.[49] Some such rules are enacted by statute, using so-called “Religious Freedom Restoration Acts. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 4:05 pm
In the case of David Miranda v Secretary of State for the Home Department, the Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis and three interveners ([2014] EWHC 255 (Admin)) the High Court rejected all the arguments supporting David Miranda’s application for judicial review of his detention at Heathrow Airport in August last year. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 12:22 pm
In Doggett v. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 6:17 am
Rush v. [read post]
18 Feb 2014, 8:12 am
Tuttle is the David R. and Sherry Kirschner Berz Research Professor of Law and Religion, at George Washington University. [read post]
18 Feb 2014, 6:44 am
Veseley v. [read post]
18 Feb 2014, 5:29 am
Also at The Volokh Conspiracy, Orin Kerr outlines “some of the possible Fourth Amendment rules that the Court might consider” in United States v. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 9:01 pm
DOMA and United States v. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 5:14 pm
On the eve of Lawrence v. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 7:26 am
My paper versus the other topics: One of these things is not like the others. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 5:14 am
Two primary sources of guidance: SCt’s unanimous 2012 decision in Hosanna Taber v. [read post]
16 Feb 2014, 9:34 am
A: Applied for: “Attorney David A. [read post]
16 Feb 2014, 7:39 am
Ex. 114, ¶5, in Smith v. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 9:35 am
Welcome, David. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 8:00 am
Id. at 667-68; see also David Powers Homes, 355 S.W.3d at 339 (discussing and applying holding of Samshi Homes). [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 9:01 pm
The three-judge panel there held that, in light of the Supreme Court’s decision last summer in United States v. [read post]
[David Kopel] Ninth Circuit strikes California’s restrictive rule against licensed carry of handguns
13 Feb 2014, 10:17 am
The Ninth Circuit’s decision in Peruta v. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 8:07 am
” Similarly, in United States v. [read post]
