Search for: "Test Plaintiff"
Results 7221 - 7240
of 21,971
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Mar 2016, 2:52 pm
In Coleman the court got rid of the immunity and substituted willful and wanton misconduct as the test for governmental liability. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 9:47 am
Relying on prior holdings under a related subsection of § 31-236 (a) and on the statutory requirement in subsection (a) (14) that disqualification results from a state or federal alcohol testing program, the trial court dismissed the plaintiff’s appeal. [read post]
19 Feb 2008, 5:33 am
Plaintiff then brought a regulatory takings claim. [read post]
6 Oct 2022, 6:46 am
On appeal, the Delaware Supreme Court held, among other things, that plaintiffs in a Section 220 action may rely on hearsay to support a proper purpose so long as the hearsay is sufficiently reliable and the Company has the ability to test the plaintiff’s stated purpose through depositions or otherwise. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 2:52 pm
In Coleman the court got rid of the immunity and substituted willful and wanton misconduct as the test for governmental liability. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 2:05 am
Plaintiffs allege that they conducted chemical testing of Defendant’s products and determined that they had “distinctly different chemical and physical properties that do not match genuine Moroccanoil Oil Treatment. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 4:22 pm
The quality and integrity of corporate decision-making is constantly being tested by new rules and regulations governing corporate compliance. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 4:22 pm
The quality and integrity of corporate decision-making is constantly being tested by new rules and regulations governing corporate compliance. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 9:28 am
The parties conducted a trial in front of Judge Belot, and on August 10, the Court found in favor of the Plaintiffs, and awarded the Plaintiff back wages and attorneys' fees. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 6:10 am
When plaintiff didn't respond, State Farm to move to compel, and plaintiff cross-moved for a protective order limiting State Farm's Demand for Interrogatories and striking its Notice for Discovery and Inspection. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 2:04 pm
The leak occurred on November 2007 while plaintiff was testing a recently acquired pipeline. [read post]
18 Apr 2014, 5:00 am
Id. at 760.So what is the general jurisdiction test, then? [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 6:27 am
” Thus, plaintiffs could prove typicality despite the variations in labels on the market. [read post]
29 Jun 2024, 5:42 am
On July 2, 2020, a week after he had reported his symptoms to his supervisor, decedent tested positive for a COVID-19 infection. [read post]
11 Mar 2012, 8:45 pm
For a second cause of action, that - the defendant negligently misinterpreted and misrepresented the tests which it had conducted; the misrepresentations of the defendant, and the damages caused thereby, were due solely to its negligence and without any contributory fault on the part of plaintiff's assignors; defendant's negligence and carelessness caused plaintiff's assignors damages in the sum of $1,000,000. [read post]
11 Nov 2020, 12:04 pm
Plaintiffs alleged that the Defendants refused to hire or promote women, including by taking active steps to commit test fraud against female applicants in the hiring process, such as altering test scores and destroying personnel and test files, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 9:07 am
The plaintiff commenced this action for divorce on January 9, 2012. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 4:30 am
After the allograft was removed from the plaintiff's knee, it was tested and no bacteria was present. [read post]
12 Jul 2013, 5:30 am
The problem for the Court’s test arises when the negligence does not directly produce the injury to the plaintiff: I drop a piano; it cracks the sidewalk; during sidewalk repairs weeks later a man barreling down the sidewalk on a bicycle hits a cone that repairmen have placed around their worksite, and is injured. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 7:44 am
In its traditional form, this test is notoriously easy for a governmental defendant to meet.But it is not necessarily the substance of the standard that makes rational basis review so deadly to equal protection plaintiffs. [read post]
