Search for: "United States v. California" Results 7221 - 7240 of 13,840
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Aug 2012, 7:40 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
United States (1968) (391US404) — Treaty Rights Survived Termination v. (24) Oneida County v. [read post]
15 May 2018, 11:25 am by Ronald Collins
One of those dots is Chief Justice John Marshall’s 1809 opinion in Bank of the United States v. [read post]
20 Feb 2007, 8:00 pm
United California Bank (1972) 23 Cal.App.3d 850, which held that, where the complaint states a cause of action in someone, but not in the plaintiff, a general demurrer for failure to state a cause of action will be sustained. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 2:25 pm
City of Bakersfield (2004) 124 Cal.App.4th 1184 (Bakersfield) and American Canyon Community United for Responsible Growth v. [read post]
28 Aug 2024, 2:23 pm by Eugene Volokh
As attorneys licensed to practice law in Oregon, we took an oath to "support the Constitution and the laws of the United States and of the State of Oregon. [read post]
30 May 2012, 4:00 am by Chris Whytock
The plaintiff may then seek enforcement of the foreign judgment in the United States. [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 4:33 am by Edith Roberts
United States, in which the justices are considering the limits of tax-law obstruction charges. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 3:55 am
They provide a lot of insight into the workings over at the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
14 Aug 2010, 9:08 pm
As to what constitutes actual “submission,” the Supreme Court explained it depends on ‘the totality of the circumstances -- the whole picture,” United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 5:41 pm by Mark Walsh
  Or a manufacturer of cars, you can sell cars in the United States, but every third car you have to give to the United States? [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 5:10 pm by Kevin Johnson
Kagan complained that the United States had pointed to few sources with which to interpret the statute. [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 2:07 pm
The United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit today ruled that several parts of the District’s gun registration law violate the Second Amendment. [read post]