Search for: "Cost v. Cost"
Results 7241 - 7260
of 48,978
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jan 2012, 9:00 pm
Down-on-their-luck David & Son, with hungry counsel, v. [read post]
4 Apr 2021, 9:02 pm
Congregation Rabbinical College of Tartikov, Inc. v Village of Pomona, 2021 WL 1222159 SDNY 3/31/2021) [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 12:00 am
The Supreme Court majority kicked that question down the line in its 2018 Lucia v. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 7:08 am
Supreme Court Justice Sunni Stromberg-Stein, in a recent decision in R. v. [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 6:30 pm
Quill Corp. v. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 4:55 am
The next day, the Supreme Court concluded in 303 Creative LLC v. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 9:00 pm
Down-on-their-luck David & Son, with hungry counsel, v. [read post]
Ind. Decisions - 7th Circuit's case involving "'Pull My Finger Fred,' a farting plush doll," is back
28 Nov 2007, 6:55 am
See JCW Invs., Inc. v. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 5:23 pm
Because I agree with the Court of Appeal.Plaintiff files a lawsuit and loses, and incurs an adverse cost award of (around) $20,000 and another adverse fee award of $160,000 on top of this. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 7:22 am
Take HHS v. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 1:42 pm
Haeger v. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 10:04 am
” Butler v. [read post]
12 Sep 2015, 9:04 am
Case citation: Katz v. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 2:58 am
Despite these interlocutory skirmishes – or perhaps because of their costs consequences – the action continues, with the trial due to begin on 4 July 2011. [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 4:00 am
In Stockman v. [read post]
1 Aug 2017, 1:05 am
“Housing costs are a huge part of any budget. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 8:21 am
This is why the Supreme Court has rightly rejected such heightened security fee policies for parades and demonstrations in traditional public fora (see Forsyth County v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 4:26 pm
The Court has opened a door here—one that the Court in Employment Division v. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 4:15 am
This purely subjective approach – assessing costs on the basis of a particular claimant - did not fulfil the Aarhus requirements as interpreted by Suliivan LJ in R (Garner) v Elmbridge Borough Council [2010] EWCA Civ 1006. [read post]
24 May 2012, 7:28 am
In Taniguchi v. [read post]
