Search for: "Legall v. State"
Results 7241 - 7260
of 88,742
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Dec 2013, 7:56 am
Casey thus has never been authorized to provide legal representation in any capacity in this state. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 9:31 am
Park Medical marijuana is currently legal in 23 states plus the District of Columbia, but more states are in the process of legalizing it. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 7:32 am
In the immigration case Macario Moreno-Morante v. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 2:50 am
Harris and United States v. [read post]
18 Feb 2023, 9:45 am
This Court's decision in United States v. [read post]
27 Jul 2008, 5:18 pm
In 2006, the Supreme Court decided Hamdan v. [read post]
16 Oct 2023, 9:41 am
L., et al. v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 12:34 pm
"***[A] court can never be assured that a plaintiff will prevail on a given legal theory prior to a dispositive ruling on the merits, and a full inquiry into the merits of a putative class’s legal claims is precisely what both the Supreme Court and we have cautioned is not appropriate for a Rule 23 certification inquiry.Slip op. at 26-27, citing Blackie v. [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 4:09 pm
The court also considered the specific strand of authority concerning legally privileged documents disclosed by mistake, sometimes called the Ashburton v Pape jurisdiction (after Lord Ashburton v Pape [1913] 2 Ch 469). [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 1:32 pm
Co. v. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 11:00 am
Increasingly, the normative foundations of the international legal order are shifting away from the traditional bedrock principles of State sovereignty and State security to new foundations based on human rights and human security. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 11:21 am
Abbott Reed v. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 3:16 am
Equally, in Mehmet Eren v Turkey [2008] ECHR 1070, the Strasbourg Court’s approach coincided with these cases as did the relevant Guidelines on the Judicial Approach to Expert Medical Evidence and the Home Secretary’s instruction Medico-Legal Reports from the Helen Bamber Foundation and the Medical Foundation Medico-Legal Report Service. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 2:25 pm
(The legal test balances prisoners’ rights against government interests; Turner involved regulations set by a state’s corrections department.) [read post]
26 May 2023, 1:04 pm
Darin v. [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 9:34 am
State v. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 2:18 pm
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 4:26 am
[D]efendant Attie had failed to obtain pre-settlement consent from the workers' compensation carrier and/or the New York State Insurance Fund and/or plaintiff's [*3]employer, which ultimately negatively affected plaintiffs' right to future workers' compensation benefits; and failure to obtain such clearance, approval, or consent constituted legal malpractice. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 7:27 am
M'Clung v. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 8:00 am
On the question of which legal test to apply, the Court made it clear that while preemption under the Supremacy Clause (which provides that federal law generally trumps contrary state law) requires Congress to clearly state its intent to preempt state requirements, preemption under the Elections Clause is more easily found because federal elections law will always displace state law. [read post]
