Search for: "Black v. State" Results 7261 - 7280 of 9,198
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Sep 2019, 9:06 am by Matthew Davie
The issues were: (1) whether ECHR Article 8 was engaged; (2) whether the SWP’s activities were “in accordance with the law”; and (3) whether the SWP’s activities were “necessary in a democratic society” in the interests of one of the objectives stated in Article 8(2), in accordance with the four-part test set out by the UK Supreme Court in Bank Mellat v Her Majesty’s Treasury (No 2) [2014] AC 700. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 8:30 am by azatty
“He was also counsel in CCR’s legal challenges to the ‘material support’ statute (Holder v. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 8:30 am by azatty
“He was also counsel in CCR’s legal challenges to the ‘material support’ statute (Holder v. [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 10:26 am by Jon
States are barred by a Supreme Court precedent, Massachusetts v. [read post]
28 Dec 2019, 8:33 am
It is not uncommon for the state apparatus itself to be impeached by the people as a core political act; but the state protects its own apparatus through an ideology of law that vests the legitimate power to impeach (like political power) only in itself. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 8:43 pm by Gordon Firemark
a=v&q=cache:VG1APbknSRMJ:pdfserver.amlaw.com/tx/ramirez_petition.pdf+Lorena+Briseno,+as+next+of+friend+of+Domonique+Ramirez+v. [read post]