Search for: "DOE v. UNITED STATES" Results 7261 - 7280 of 44,320
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Mar 2021, 7:04 am by Tom Rhodus
United States, 553 F.3d 410  (5th Cir. 2008)  illustrates how the separate tax debt of one spouse can be collected from community property. [read post]
7 Mar 2021, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
Under the (perhaps largely defunct) “Lemon test” from Lemon v. [read post]
7 Mar 2021, 4:34 pm by INFORRM
United States Alec Baldwin’s defamation lawsuit has been given the green light to head to trial. [read post]
7 Mar 2021, 7:07 am by Joel R. Brandes
It may be downloaded at https://www.childsupport.ny.gov/dcse/pdfs/CSSA.pdf The 2021 poverty income guidelines amount for a single person as reported by the United States Department of Health and Human Services is $12,880 and the 2021 self-support reserve is $17,388. [read post]
7 Mar 2021, 7:01 am by Joel R. Brandes
It agreed with the District Court’s conclusion that Appellant met her burden of showing L.S. was well-settled in the United States. [read post]
5 Mar 2021, 4:15 pm by Josh Blackman
Wilkinson and United States Fish and Wildlife Serv. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2021, 12:30 pm by John Ross
[Waters of the United States, stolen gift cards, and Hester Prynne.] [read post]
5 Mar 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The court explained that the federal preemption doctrine has its roots in the Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution, and federal preemption of state laws generally can occur in three ways: 1. [read post]
5 Mar 2021, 4:00 am
 The  United States Supreme Court has started every session since February 1, 1790  with "Oyez Oyez..........God save the United States and this honorable Court". [read post]
4 Mar 2021, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
Furthermore, in Handyside v United Kingdom Strasbourg accepted that freedom of speech applies to views which shock and offend and which are heartily disapproved of by the recipient [49]. [read post]
4 Mar 2021, 7:34 am by Larry
However, in these cases, in the absence of any information from the defendant indicating a reason to mitigate the penalty or duty collection, the Court issued judgment in favor of the United States at the amounts asserted. [read post]