Search for: "English v. English" Results 7261 - 7280 of 11,204
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 May 2023, 2:21 am by Aida Tohala (Bristows)
Indeed, it is the first time that the Enlarged Board of Appeal’s decision has been considered in an English judgment. [read post]
19 Jan 2013, 4:18 am by Marty Lederman
  More recently, in footnote 20 of its 1997 decision in Arizonans for Official English v. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 1:22 am by Melina Padron
– The Human Rights Roundup November 28, 2011 Graeme Hall Rights, responsibilities and the new Aids denialism November 25, 2011 Rosalind English Bratza bites back November 25, 2011 Adam Wagner “Sons of Cadder” – Supreme Court rulings on legal advice during police interviews November 24, 2011 Rosalind English Filed under: In the news, Roundup Tagged: human rights [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 12:49 am by Sam Murrant
July 10, 2012 Rosalind English How most Australians do human rights without a Human Rights Act July 9, 2012 David Hart QC Supreme Court dismisses self-incrimination appeal July 9, [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 5:17 pm by INFORRM
Causes of action for invasion of privacy exist in English and NZ law: Campbell v MGN ([2004] 2 AC 457) and Hosking v Runting ([2005] 1 NZLR 1). [read post]
3 May 2020, 8:55 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The Supreme Court of Canada reviewed this in 1989 in R. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
It also considered whether the December 2014 decision was itself a reorganisation measure which required recognition by the English courts. [read post]
26 May 2011, 7:02 am by Ray Dowd
   An ad for Galerie Voemel brags of its legacy:Die Galerie Vömel, mehr als ein halbes Jahrhundert in Düsseldorf ansässig, wurde von Alex Vömel - Geschäftsführer der legendären Galerie Flechtheim - gegründet und wird heute von seinem Sohn Edwin Vömel weiter geführt.Vor einigen Jahren ist die Galerie in das alte Stadtpalais gegenüber vom Stadtmuseum in die Karlstadt umgesiedelt.Die Galerie Vömel… [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 10:59 am
The first comes from the murky waters of English defamation law, though it ends with a victory for the newspaper. [read post]