Search for: "Lowe v. State" Results 7261 - 7280 of 9,594
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jan 2012, 2:25 pm by Andrew Dat
If you haven’t been following this case (CompuCredit Corp and Synovus Bank v. [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 5:53 pm by Richard Hunt
The case is also interesting because it was brought entirely under California state law. [read post]
21 Sep 2021, 11:52 am by Eric Goldman
The law governs users who meet any of the following: resides in the state, does business in the state, or “shares or receives content on a social media platform in this state. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 3:39 am by Florian Mueller
A comparison of the number of amicus briefs filed shows where most of the attention was. 54 briefs in Oil States vs. only in SAS. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 4:20 am
This justification may consist (and in my view usually does exist) where the likely and actual use for private copying will be low and therefore logically any harm caused will be insignificant as determined under a statistical assessment. [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 4:00 am by Ken Chasse
[v] The appearance of such proposal is that of a solution to all parts of the problem, when in fact it can have no effect upon the cost of legal advice services. [read post]
31 Aug 2022, 10:21 pm by Bennett Cyphers
Fog Reveal is also “ideal for tipping and cueing,” which means using low-resolution, dragnet surveillance to decide where to perform more targeted, high-resolution monitoring. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 1:42 pm by WIMS
The Federal closed area does not apply to any state waters. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 8:44 am by Arielle Harris
” SB 118: UC Enrollment Changes Not A CEQA “Project” Senate Bill 118 was the State Legislature’s targeted response to Save Berkeley’s Neighborhoods v. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 2:30 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Compared to 2(d) refusals, just really low. [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 9:00 am by Guest Blogger
On the interpretive front, the canonical Supreme Court rendering of the executive branch’s interpretive discretion is found in Chevron v. [read post]
13 Jun 2007, 12:41 pm
  Such a decision was the Eighth Circuit's ruling in Watson v. [read post]
2 Nov 2022, 9:36 am by INFORRM
Austrian Post case The AG’s opinion in Case C-300/12 UI v Österreichische Post AG (a.k.a. the ‘Austrian Post’ case) has given us a clue as to the CJEU’s likely reasoning on two questions which have, for some time, been of interest to UK defendants given both the spectre of ‘opt-out’ class actions, and plague of ‘(no-to-)low-value’ identikit claims brought by personal injury firms. [read post]