Search for: "People v. House" Results 7261 - 7280 of 12,873
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jun 2014, 7:52 am
The first is one I noted in my earlier post; the judicial guess that people don’t know how cell phones work strikes me as very dubious. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 5:32 am by Susan Brenner
The federal district court judge who ruled on Jefferson's argument began his analysis by outlining the applicable law: The Fourth Amendment protects the `right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects against unreasonable searches and seizures.' . . . [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 5:50 am by INFORRM
PCC staff are available at all times to advise members of the public further, and to offer practical, immediate assistance.” Since last week’s round up there are a number of “resolved” PCC complaints to report: Mr Julian Assange v The Observer The Observer, clause 1, 09/03/2012; Mrs Christine Hemming v Sunday Mercury, clause 1, 08/03/2012; Mrs Carol Mlatem v South Wales Argus, clause 3, 08/03/2012; Ms Pamela Fenton v Sunday Mail, clause 1,… [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 7:24 pm by Marc DeGirolami
  The latter was the older rule in a case from the early 1980s, People v. [read post]
16 Jul 2007, 6:09 pm
He cited the Third District's ruling in People v. [read post]
4 Feb 2018, 3:00 am by NCC Staff
On November 13, 1956, the Supreme Court ruled in the case of Browder v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 7:31 pm
In this, my third and final post on the Ninth Circuit en banc decision in Byrd v. [read post]