Search for: "Plaintiff(s)"
Results 7261 - 7280
of 178,501
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Sep 2023, 4:05 am
[P]laintiff’s complaint fails to allege facts that, if proven, would show that plaintiff is “sufficiently identified with and subject to the influence” of the individuals it seeks to represent in this lawsuit.... [read post]
4 Sep 2023, 3:00 am
This clause therefore applies precisely to plaintiff’s situation. [read post]
4 Sep 2023, 2:42 am
However, that judge held that the plaintiffs in the Florida case “lack standing to challenge” Trump’s qualifications for seeking election, “as the injuries alleged … are not cognizable and not particular to them. [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 7:46 pm
Plus, Giuliani will have to pay attorneys' fees to the plaintiff's lawyers and more in sanctions.Giuliani is in real trouble. [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 7:25 pm
Plus, Giuliani will have to pay attorneys' fees to the plaintiff's lawyers and more in sanctions.Giuliani is in real trouble. [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 6:56 pm
Desmond from interfering with the Blount County Pride Festival under Tennessee’s Adult Entertainment Act (AEA). [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 2:23 pm
” The plaintiffs stated that the governor’s plan would cut the number of Black districts in half, from four to two, and give the Republican party a disproportionate advantage in twenty out of twenty-eight districts. [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 9:43 am
ADA testing was quick and cheap – a single plaintiff could generate a dozen lawsuits a day. [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 7:00 am
"The City's decision to exclude Country Mill Farms from the 2017 East Lansing Farmer's Market constituted a burden on Plaintiffs' religious beliefs. [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 3:51 am
Here, Plaintiffs lack standing to challenge Defendant’s qualifications for seeking the Presidency, as the injuries alleged are not cognizable and not particular to them. [read post]
2 Sep 2023, 11:44 am
Ron DeSantis (R), whose state is one of the plaintiffs in the present case. [read post]
2 Sep 2023, 8:54 am
The Third Circuit affirmed the district court's rulings in Berg and reiterated that the plaintiff "suffered no injury particularized to him" and, therefore, lacked standing. [read post]
2 Sep 2023, 7:53 am
The jury ruled in plaintiff’s favor finding that the landlord failed to keep the premises reasonably safe and that his negligence was a substantial factor in causing Jason’s elevated lead levels. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 9:22 pm
The court found that the plaintiffs lacked standing to file the complaint, insofar as they failed to demonstrate that Trump seeking a second term in office could constitute cognizable injury. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 9:17 pm
The number of damages awarded to a plaintiff under the modified comparative fault rule is subsequently lowered by an amount that's proportional to the plaintiff's level of fault in the incident. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 2:55 pm
A prospective user of social media must first prove their age by uploading a specified form of identification, such as a driver's license, to the third-party vendor's website. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 2:19 pm
While remaining silent with respect to these other organizations, businesses and political officials/candidates, Defendants singled out Plaintiff with a series of articles designed to incite or induce members of the public to refuse to do business with Plaintiff, make charitable contributions to Plaintiff, attend Plaintiff's gala, and/or detrimentally impact the Plaintiff's reputation and marketability, purportedly because of… [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 2:14 pm
One of the nation’s preeminent plaintiffs’ law firms, Seeger Weiss is best known for multidistrict mass torts and class actions in both state and federal court—and especially for taking those cases to trial. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 2:11 pm
The plaintiff in this case has requested leave to appeal to the Court of Appeal of Quebec. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 1:47 pm
” Marshall also refuted the plaintiffs’ argument that prosecution of such acts violates protections located under the US Constitution’s First Amendment by asserting that precedent forecloses First Amendment defenses when the act in question is a crime. [read post]
