Search for: "STATE V. POWERS"
Results 7261 - 7280
of 41,391
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jul 2021, 1:29 pm
(S.E.C. v. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 7:03 am
City of Chicago v. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 6:04 am
When Droste v. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
The court explained that in this instance the appointing authority was not authorized to designate another individual to receive an employee's written resignation in lieu of the resignation being delivered to him.[10] The Appellate Division's decision noted that although the heads of other departments in the jurisdiction were specifically authorized to delegate the power to receive the delivery of an employee's resignation to a designated individual,[11]the powers… [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
The court explained that in this instance the appointing authority was not authorized to designate another individual to receive an employee's written resignation in lieu of the resignation being delivered to him.[10] The Appellate Division's decision noted that although the heads of other departments in the jurisdiction were specifically authorized to delegate the power to receive the delivery of an employee's resignation to a designated individual,[11]the powers… [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
The court explained that in this instance the appointing authority was not authorized to designate another individual to receive an employee's written resignation in lieu of the resignation being delivered to him.[10] The Appellate Division's decision noted that although the heads of other departments in the jurisdiction were specifically authorized to delegate the power to receive the delivery of an employee's resignation to a designated individual,[11]the powers… [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
The court explained that in this instance the appointing authority was not authorized to designate another individual to receive an employee's written resignation in lieu of the resignation being delivered to him.[10] The Appellate Division's decision noted that although the heads of other departments in the jurisdiction were specifically authorized to delegate the power to receive the delivery of an employee's resignation to a designated individual,[11]the powers… [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 3:39 am
As explained in Hesham Ali v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2016] 1 WLR 4799, Parliamentary and public concern about failures to deport large numbers of foreign citizens who had committed serious offences in the UK led to the adoption of the UK Borders Act 2007, which provided that for the purpose of the Secretary of State’s power to deport under the 1971 Act, the deportation of a foreign criminal is conducive to the public good. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 12:00 am
In cases like Church of the Lukumi Babalu Aye v. [read post]
15 Jul 2021, 9:01 pm
In Nestlé v. [read post]
15 Jul 2021, 9:35 am
The "equal suffrage" references in Article V of the Constitution is that of states, not of state populations. [read post]
15 Jul 2021, 5:01 am
" Lunney v. [read post]
15 Jul 2021, 3:22 am
(§ 32 V-W.) [read post]
14 Jul 2021, 9:03 pm
In Gundy v. [read post]
14 Jul 2021, 9:01 pm
In its 1989 decision in Rodriguez de Quijas v. [read post]
14 Jul 2021, 2:20 pm
Khouri (Indian Taxation; Sovereign Immunity) United States v. [read post]
14 Jul 2021, 6:17 am
The Parens Patriae Model In 1892, in Illinois Central Railroad Co. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 4:05 pm
Concerning SEPs the Executive Order states: To avoid the potential for anticompetitive extension of market power beyond the scope of granted patents, and to protect standard-setting processes from abuse, the Attorney General and the Secretary of Commerce are encouraged to consider whether to revise their position on the intersection of the intellectual property and antitrust laws, including by considering whether to revise the Policy Statement on Remedies for… [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 4:05 pm
Concerning SEPs the Executive Order states: To avoid the potential for anticompetitive extension of market power beyond the scope of granted patents, and to protect standard-setting processes from abuse, the Attorney General and the Secretary of Commerce are encouraged to consider whether to revise their position on the intersection of the intellectual property and antitrust laws, including by considering whether to revise the Policy Statement on Remedies for… [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 12:52 pm
Massachusetts (1905), the Court found that such programs are the quintessential state power rather than a federal power. [read post]
