Search for: "State v. David" Results 7261 - 7280 of 14,238
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jun 2018, 5:51 am by Dennis Crouch
Stasa, Shareholder, Brooks Kushman PC, Southfield, Michigan and David C. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 6:39 am by Nabiha Syed
” Courthouse News Service also reports on briefs filed in United States v. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 2:56 pm
Law Center) Eugene Volokh (UCLA School of Law) David Welkowitz (Whittier Law School) A PDF of the brief is here, but I enclose the bulk of the text below: SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT The panel decision in this case followed the majority opinion in In re NCAA Student-Athlete Name & Likeness Licensing Litigation (“Keller v. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 9:34 am
 After “laughing [himself] into a state of hyperventilation,” Kahan penned a more serious response, pointing out how Krugman’s essay was itself evidence of how “ ideologically motivated reasoning is in fact perfectly symmetric with respect to right-left ideology. [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 7:30 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Processing an application for accidental disability retirementMagistro v DiNapoli, 2016 NY Slip Op 05893, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentBodenmiller v DiNapoli, 2016 NY Slip Op 05894, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentMembers of the New York State Policemen's and Firemen's Retirement System injured on the job and and as a result are "physically or mentally incapacitated for performance of duty” may apply for an accidental disability retirement… [read post]
13 Dec 2017, 9:53 am by Garrett Hinck
David Houck summarized the Nov. 17 military commission hearings in U.S. v. al-Nashiri. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 12:41 am by CMS
He refers to R (on the application of Miller and another) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union [2017] UKSC 5, noting it is consistent with the UK Government position. 1449: David Johnston QC refers to the Fixed Term Parliaments Act 2011 in accordance with which dissolution must take place. [read post]
12 May 2019, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
” Critics assert, in particular, that the president seems oblivious to a 1993 Supreme Court ruling, Nixon v. [read post]