Search for: "State v. Saide" Results 7261 - 7280 of 57,125
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Aug 2013, 1:49 pm by Rebecca Jeschke
"Within the past month, we've seen a coalition of state attorneys general ask Congress to gut CDA 230 to make way for harmful laws like New Jersey's," said Zimmerman. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 8:10 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Appellate Division sustained the dismissal on the ground of sovereign immunity and lack of subject matter jurisdiction, citing Jattan v Queens Coll. of City Univ. of N.Y., 64 AD3d 540. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 8:10 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Appellate Division sustained the dismissal on the ground of sovereign immunity and lack of subject matter jurisdiction, citing Jattan v Queens Coll. of City Univ. of N.Y., 64 AD3d 540. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 8:10 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Appellate Division sustained the dismissal on the ground of sovereign immunity and lack of subject matter jurisdiction, citing Jattan v Queens Coll. of City Univ. of N.Y., 64 AD3d 540. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 3:53 pm by Hannah Kiddoo
At the General Session Luncheon on June 27, 2014, during the State Bar of Texas’s Annual Meeting in Austin, 2013-2014 State Bar of Texas President Lisa M. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 8:10 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Appellate Division sustained the dismissal on the ground of sovereign immunity and lack of subject matter jurisdiction, citing Jattan v Queens Coll. of City Univ. of N.Y., 64 AD3d 540. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 10:54 am by Karen Gullo
“GEMSA may not like what we’ve said about its patent, but we will defend our right to express our constitutionally protected opinion. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
The Appellate Division said that “it has been established that municipal employees are not agents of the Retirement System,” citing Bruni v Regan, 133 AD2d 921, leave to appeal denied 71 NY2d 806.The Appellate Division further noted that “estoppel may not be invoked against the State generally,” and "erroneous advice by a government employee does not constitute the type of unusual circumstance contemplated by the exception" in advancing… [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 4:18 am by Russ Bensing
™  In State v. [read post]