Search for: "ALL PLAINTIFFS " Results 7281 - 7300 of 95,168
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 May 2016, 8:30 am by Ed Maginnis
The employment law attorneys at Maginnis Law are experienced in all areas of employment contract drafting and review. [read post]
19 Jan 2018, 12:45 pm by Ed Maginnis
Nearly all car accidents are caused by the negligence of one or more of the drivers involved. [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 6:53 am by Walter Olson
Shot: Jury awards Colorado discrimination plaintiff $19,000. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 7:49 am by Allan Blutstein
Summaries of all published opinions issued since April 2015 are available here. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 6:28 am by Parrish McLeod
Unfortunately, not all automobile insurance companies deal fairly with claimants. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 3:14 pm by marcorandazza
Randazza It’s an all-too-common scenario: A blogger criticizes someone online, and then gets sued for his statements. [read post]
18 Dec 2021, 11:44 am by Allan Blutstein
Summaries of all published opinions issued since April 2015 are available here. [read post]
28 Mar 2020, 10:12 am by Allan Blutstein
. -- concluding that plaintiff was eligible and entitled to award of costs and attorneys’ fees, but reducing fee award from $88,889.93 to $76,928.80 because of insufficiently detailed time entries, excessive time billed on assorted communications, and for time spent on unsuccessful motion.Summaries of all published opinions issued since April 2015 are available here. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 1:10 pm by Heather Cobun
District Court in Greenbelt, includes 176 plaintiffs from all 50 states, Washington, D.C., Puerto Rico and the U.S. [read post]
5 Feb 2007, 5:53 am
According to the article,lead plaintiffs Jennifer Gratz and Patrick Hamacherhave agreed to "drop all claims under a... class-actionlawsuit against the university over its formeraffirmative action admissions policies. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 8:21 pm by Donn Zaretsky
  The plaintiff in the case, the original theft victim, lost on statute of limitations grounds because he should have discovered (and, in fact, may actually have discovered) that the painting was found all the way back in 1989. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 12:22 pm by Michael C. Smith
Bush   Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction Recommended DeniedFor the alter ego groupies out there (and we all are at least once in a while) Judge Bush recommended denying the defendants' motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction, holding that the plaintiff made a sufficient showing that the alter ego doctrine applied. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 5:44 am by Parrish McLeod
United Property Management owns and operates residential rental properties all across the state of North Carolina. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 7:59 pm by Allan Blutstein
” Summaries of all published opinions issued since April 2015 are available here. [read post]
6 Dec 2007, 11:49 am
CIV.A. 4:06CV285) Judge: Don BushHolding: Plaintiff's Amended Motion to Exclude Expert Testimony GRANTEDJudge Bush excluded the testimony first of all because the expert's overall methodology was flawed, but in the course of making this determination he also determined that the opinion should be excluded because it was irrelevant. [read post]
3 Nov 2021, 5:00 am by Sujain Thomas
More than 1.5 million personal injury cases are filed every year all across the globe. [read post]
7 Mar 2018, 6:41 am by Ricardo Rozen
Plaintiffs alleged various common law and statutory consumer protection causes of action based on Tropicana’s alleged false marketing of its orange juice as “all […] [read post]
12 Oct 2018, 6:04 am by Allan Blutstein
Summaries of all published opinions issued since April 2015 are available here. [read post]
5 May 2009, 3:33 am
Previously the lower Court had awarded the employer Summary Judgment finding that all of the Plaintiff’s were exempt under the FLSA’s Administrative Exemption. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 1:44 am
Judgment Released: April 26, 2010   Link to Judgment The plaintiff brought a motion under Rule 31.05.1(1) for leave to examine each of the three defendants for seven hours, as opposed to the new general rule of seven hours for all defendants collectively. [read post]