Search for: "Companies A, B, and C"
Results 7281 - 7300
of 12,894
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Aug 2022, 3:41 pm
Social uses are similarly aspirational but less meaningless b/c they have discursive meaning. [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 1:54 pm
I was amazed when a Republican convention, for the first time ever, supported the notion of penalizing companies for moving jobs out of the United States. [read post]
2 Sep 2020, 9:22 am
This is an argument about the limits of the USPTO Director's discretion in how his agency implements the AIA.Plan B would be for the court to deem the NHK-Fintiv rule arbitrary and capricious.As a last resort (Plan C), the complaint claims that the USPTO Director failed to fulfill the requirement of "notice-and comment rulemaking. [read post]
17 Dec 2020, 1:20 pm
When Beyond 79 sent a C&D to Londes, it shortly thereafter “received a similar letter from counsel to EGC alleging Lanham Act violations. [read post]
10 Feb 2024, 4:24 am
That said, it would appear sensible to do so particularly in cases such as this, where companies operate in the same sector with similar marks, and so the chances of a claim are heightened. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 10:26 pm
On 30 April 2021, Free Holdings, a Canadian company, re-registered McCoy’s Quantum name in the Namecoin blockchain. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 4:05 am
The key factors for the Court in Stanner were that: (a) the employer encouraged employees to use the fitness center, (b) flexible work hours were available to enable employees to use the facility, (c) the employer distributed brochures to employees advising that physical fitness benefits both the employee and the employer, and (d) the employer's benefits manager testified that employee participation in the fitness program reduced overall health care costs. [read post]
3 Dec 2023, 2:00 pm
It may specifically be illegal under foreign law for the company to provide data in response to such an order. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 8:17 am
With neither company taking responsibility for Mr Moffat’s employment post-transfer, his employment terminated and he brought a claim against both companies in the Employment Tribunal. [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 11:00 pm
(b) Restricted access: Authorised access to limited detail on recorded IK that is classified as confidential. [read post]
1 Dec 2013, 1:59 am
Here, the court showed that the defendant a) arranged for the duplication of computer data, b) possessed that data by exercising control over it, and c) intended to benefit either himself or someone else with the data. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 3:15 pm
§ 42.20(c). [read post]
5 Aug 2019, 12:31 am
The only thing in common is unprotectable expression — evenly spaced “C and “B” notes — repeated. [read post]
25 Oct 2016, 1:22 am
For readers not familiar with the term, pharmacovigilance can be described as the ongoing monitoring and reporting obligations of pharmaceutical companies concerning the detection, assessment, and prevention of adverse effects or any other drug related problem. [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 3:24 am
Since no reputation had been proved for the Monte-Carlo mark, the claim for infringement under Article 9(1)(c) of the same Regulation had to fail. [read post]
9 Jan 2015, 8:52 am
is a good idea b. [read post]
28 Aug 2013, 5:52 am
Rob Rhinehart, a software engineer based in San Francisco, has research and developed ‘Soylent’, a mixture of minerals including calcium, potassium, zinc, vitamins A, B, C, D, E and K. [read post]
22 Dec 2012, 6:32 am
(c) The contract shall show: 1. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 7:03 am
For example, in Company at 34 v. [read post]
1 Nov 2012, 3:52 am
By removing the interpretation of a private company as to what constitutes an emergency, harm or unlawful act. [read post]