Search for: "Doe v. Doe" Results 7281 - 7300 of 137,455
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jun 2008, 8:46 pm
The administration, though, wants the justices to decide that federal law for indigent capital defendants does not extend taxpayer support to state clemency efforts.Seven cases are yet to be ruled on, including Kennedy v. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 9:00 am by Jason M. Knott
Most recently, on Tuesday, the Tenth Circuit held that an employee is protected under Sarbanes-Oxley for reporting misconduct even when the misconduct does not involve a fraud against shareholders (Lockheed Martin Corp. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 7:40 am by Docket Navigator
Accordingly, the Court finds that TC Heartland does not qualify for the intervening law exception to waiver because it merely affirms the viability of [Fourco Glass Co. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 3:29 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
"The fact that the plaintiff subsequently was unhappy with the settlement obtained by the defendant does not rise to the level of legal malpractice" (Holschauer v Fisher, 5 AD3d 553, 554). [read post]
3 May 2016, 1:01 pm
The Court of Appeal's published opinion does not mention the appellate attorney's name. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 5:55 am by Steve Kalar
It does to Judge Kleinfeld (left) in a new categorical analysis decision, United States v. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 4:16 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Because SORA does not define "conviction," the court in Matter of Smith found it appropriate to look to CPL 1.20 (13), which provides that conviction includes “the entry of a plea of guilty” to an accusatory instrument, does not recognize nolo contendere pleas as was also held in People v Daiboch. [read post]