Search for: "Lowe v. State"
Results 7281 - 7300
of 9,685
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jun 2016, 6:40 am
SynEcology Partners, L3C v. [read post]
1 Jun 2022, 7:42 am
Stated differently, SA’s drawing of this equivalence constitutes a lie about a zygote being a baby. [read post]
13 Oct 2024, 7:47 pm
The crash involved two vehicles: a gray Honda CR-V and a blue Ford F-150. [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 7:06 am
.'" Indeed, the Court has stated—and regularly restated—that government officials violate clearly established law only when "'[t]he contours of [a] right [are] sufficiently clear' that every 'reasonable official would [have understood] that what he is doing violates that right.'" The challenge of identifying clearly established law is heightened further by the Court's decision in Pearson v. [read post]
11 Feb 2017, 3:13 pm
TransCanada Hydro Northeast v. [read post]
7 May 2015, 7:56 am
Circuit Court of Appeals heard arguments from the SEC and a mutual fund regarding the SEC’s decision to deny the fund’s application for an exemption for its method of accounting for potential deferred tax liability (Copley Fund, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Oct 2019, 9:53 am
Fifty years after the enactment of the Fair Housing Act (FHA), housing discrimination remains a national disgrace in the United States. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 1:00 am
This morning the Mannheim Regional Court ordered a stay of a Samsung v. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 4:00 am
The case was Schwaner v. [read post]
18 Jan 2022, 7:53 am
ISK Biocides, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Feb 2015, 7:42 am
RFA Brands, LLC v. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 7:44 am
The ruling was published yesterday (in Dutch), the same day that a German court gave short shrift to a Nokia v. [read post]
5 Nov 2012, 12:30 am
Supreme Court’s 2012 decisions in Morrison v. [read post]
4 May 2016, 7:42 am
The US Supreme Court has agreed to hear Star Athletica, LLC v. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 8:35 am
This week, the Ohio Supreme Court issued a sharply divided 4-3 opinion in Freshwater v. [read post]
1 May 2024, 3:31 am
Kneipp's position was that the documents produced by Patou did not provide evidence of JOY's reputation in France, because market share is a critical factor in evidencing a mark's reputation and the perfume Joy by Jean Patou was: (a) sold only by selected luxury and prominent retailers; and (b) had generated only a low turnover in 2016, 2017 and 2018, with a steady decrease since 2016. [read post]
27 May 2022, 1:42 pm
Requiring only that police state that they intend to “identify and/or verify commonalities” in the data on thousands of people is a low bar. [read post]
27 Jan 2023, 1:00 am
Jing was young, inexperienced, had a small salary, and had low status in the University as a research intern. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 7:37 pm
In U.S. federal court, it's not impossible but certainly rather difficult to satisfy the eBay v. [read post]
28 Jan 2017, 9:29 am
State v. [read post]
