Search for: "MATTER OF T F"
Results 7281 - 7300
of 13,490
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 May 2014, 9:05 am
[T]he State argued that Brewington issued several different types of threats …. [read post]
1 May 2014, 4:50 am
Defendants’ aggregate liability was tied to a concrete, objective set of facts—total sales—“that will remain the same no matter how many claims are submitted. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 3:30 pm
" Specifically, Love tweeted: “I was f—— devestated when Rhonda J. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 8:38 am
Courts did not award fees under §70 as a matter of course. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 6:05 am
But it doesn’t matter, because you can’t run through the Polaroid factors on a motion to dismiss. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 5:21 am
Physician Servs., Inc., 360 F.3d 173, 178 (3d Cir. 2004).Frankly, the Court didn't engage in much analysis. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 4:44 am
§ 230(f)(2). [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 9:51 am
” But I didn’t need a lexicographic weatherman to know what the sentence said about the panel’s view of Judge Cortez’s situation. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 9:00 am
A statutory section, IRC § 6223(f), prohibits amendment (absent fraud, malfeasance, or material misrepresentation) after “the Secretary mails” an FPAA. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 7:16 am
In light of each of these concerns, as a general matter, it is unlikely that pay for priority would satisfy the "no unreasonable discrimination" standard. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 4:00 am
With the advent of sous vide cooking in restaurants and now at home, many thought nirvana had been reached: you chose your temperature — say, a 65°F egg — and no matter how long the egg sat in the water bath it would emerge cooked to your idea of perfection. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 1:57 pm
(F) (A) or (C), at Father's option. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 3:16 am
Hasan, 245 F.3d 682, 684-85 (8th Cir. 2001). [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 10:00 pm
” Pretty clear evidence of what it was to be used for, wouldn’t you say? [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 6:47 pm
., 251 F.3d 955, 967 (Fed. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 2:35 pm
Interpreting the statute, Justice Kennedy’s opinion for the Court (joined by Justices Ginsburg, Breyer, Alito, and Kagan) concluded that the “proximate result” limitation found in Subsection F applied not just where it appears (in Subsection F) but also to the other parts of the statute. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 8:50 am
” Another first-time relist is T-Mobile South, LLC v. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 4:18 am
Without a horse in the race, the 911 call is little more than noise, no matter how many immaterial details match up. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 11:29 pm
Under the proper interpretationof the volume limitation, Novel established noninfringementas a matter of law. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 6:05 pm
Didn’t matter that the cops didn’t see anything wrong. [read post]
