Search for: "People v Long"
Results 7281 - 7300
of 18,903
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Aug 2018, 8:47 am
Incarcerated Entertainment, LLC v. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 6:49 am
From his order (via Professor Berman's site):Last year in United States v. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 8:58 am
Perhaps it is inherently difficult to think through the implications of changing a longstanding legal reality on which so many millions of people have relied for so long. [read post]
16 Oct 2024, 12:29 pm
In this case, ASTM v. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 1:53 pm
James Obergefell is a plaintiff in Obergefell, et al. v. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 10:48 am
As Justice Sotomayor wrote in United States v. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 4:22 pm
We filed an amicus brief in the appeal, Neville v. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 2:35 pm
State v. [read post]
15 Feb 2018, 1:41 pm
However, it appeared for a long time on the Globe and Mail’s non-fiction bestseller list. [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 1:46 pm
Tibbs, From Black Power to Prison Power: The Making of Jones v. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 3:49 pm
So, let's get started.Do you remember United States v. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 1:45 pm
On Tuesday, a federal appeals court will hear oral argument in Fulton v. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 5:01 am
A recent case, Grainger v. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 10:24 am
Consider how powerful the Samsung emails about keeping up with the iPhone were in the Apple v. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 8:46 am
See Public Utilities Code § 2891.1, also People v. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 7:19 am
We condemn the Supreme Court’s activist decision in Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
10 Aug 2014, 5:00 am
” Jacobellis v. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 5:47 pm
"from FTC v. [read post]
25 Sep 2023, 10:39 am
My guess is that in discussions about whether to create a plural executive you’d find the same assumption at work, with people saying that distinctions among those people would have to be made expressly in the Constitution or adopted by the executives themselves. [read post]
9 Apr 2023, 9:30 pm
And Frankfurter has got to be bothered by the fact that Mark said in 1976 that the "time has come to blow the whistle on the Holmes Devise History of the Supreme Court"-presumably because the volumes have been taking too long to get out, since Frankfurter and Freund assigned them to the wrong people. [read post]
